OS analysis of patients with different short-term response and progression patterns of donafenib versus sorafenib as first-line therapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: An exploratory subgroup analysis of ZGDH3.

Authors

null

Shukui Qin

Jinling Hospital, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, China

Shukui Qin , Feng Bi , Jianming Xu , Chengyou Du , Qingxia Fan , Longzhen Zhang , Min Tao , Da Jiang , Senming Wang , Yongping Chen , Jifang Sheng , Xuelong Zhuang , Jun Wu

Organizations

Jinling Hospital, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, China, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Sichuan, China, Chiness PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China, Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China, The Affiliated Hospital of XuZhou Medical University, Xuzhou, China, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China, Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China, Zhujiang Hospital of Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China, The 1st Affiliated Hospital of WMU, Wenzhou, China, The first affiliated hospital,Zhejiang university school of medicine, Hangzhou, China, Cancer hospital of Shantou university medical college, Shantou, China, The First People’s Hospital of Changzhou, Changzhou, China

Research Funding

No funding received
None.

Background: Donafenib, a deuterated derivative of sorafenib, significantly prolonged overall survival (OS) in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma in an open, randomized, parallel-controlled phase II/III trial (ZGDH3) compared with sorafenib. The purpose of this study was to explore and analyse the OS benefits of donafenib and sorafenib treatment in patients with different short-term response and progression patterns. Methods: This analysis was based on the ITT population of ZGDH3 study (defined as all randomized patients). The median OS of donafenib and sorafenib was assessed by the Kaplan-Meier method and was compared according to different short-term response (SD, others) and progression patterns (intrahepatic lesion growth, intrahepatic new lesion, extrahepatic lesion growth, extrahepatic new lesion). The stratified Cox proportional hazard model was used to calculate the hazard ratio and its 95% confidence interval. Results: 668 patients were included in the analysis (334 in each group). Donafenib was associated with a trend of improved OS benefit when compared with sorafenib in most subgroups (HR < 1), including best short-term response of SD or others, confirmed short-term response of SD or others, intrahepatic lesion growth or not, intrahepatic new lesion or not, extrahepatic new lesion or not, no extrahepatic lesion growth. The benefit was statistically significant in the following subgroups: in patients with response of SD, the mOS of donafenib and sorafenib were 19.3 and 15.5 months, respectively (HR 0.714, 95%CI 0.550-0.928). Among patients with confirmed response of SD, the mOS was 29.0 and 22.8 months, respectively (HR 0.641, 95% CI 0.418-0.983). Among patients without extrahepatic lesion growth (defined as lesion growth ≥20% from baseline), the mOS was 12.6 months and 10.0 months, respectively (HR 0.783, 95% CI 0.648-0.945). Among patients without new extrahepatic lesions, the mOS was 13.1 months and 11.0 months (HR 0.816, 95% CI 0.677-0.998), respectively. Conclusions: Donafenib exhibited better survival benefit than sorafenib in most subgroups, especially in patients with the best response and confirmed best response of SD, which further confirmed the excellent efficacy of donafenib in first-line treatment of advanced HCC. Clinical trial information: NCT02645981.

Exploratory subgroup comparison of donafenib vs sorafenib in OS.

SubgroupMedian (months)HR (95% CI)
SD19.3 vs 15.50.714 (0.550, 0.928)
Confirmed SD29.0 vs 22.80.641 (0.418, 0.983)
No Extrahepatic lesion growth12.6 vs 10.00.783 (0.648, 0.945)
No New extrahepatic lesion13.1 vs 11.00.816 (0.667, 0.998)

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2023 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Publication Only

Session Title

Publication Only: Gastrointestinal Cancer—Gastroesophageal, Pancreatic, and Hepatobiliary

Track

Gastrointestinal Cancer—Gastroesophageal, Pancreatic, and Hepatobiliary

Sub Track

Hepatobiliary Cancer - Advanced/Metastatic Disease

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT02645981

Citation

J Clin Oncol 41, 2023 (suppl 16; abstr e16143)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2023.41.16_suppl.e16143

Abstract #

e16143

Abstract Disclosures