Impact of risk factors on overall survival (OS) in patients (pts) with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treated with first-line (1L) tislelizumab (TIS).

Authors

null

Masatoshi Kudo

Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Osaka, Osaka, Japan

Masatoshi Kudo , Richard S. Finn , Tim Meyer , Frederic Boisserie , Songzi Li , Yaxi Chen , Ramil Abdrashitov , Andrew X. Zhu , Arndt Vogel , Shukui Qin

Organizations

Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Osaka, Osaka, Japan, Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, Royal Free Hospital NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom, BeiGene (USA) Co., Ltd., Ridgefield Park, NJ, BeiGene (Beijing) Co., Ltd., Beijing, China, BeiGene Co., Ltd., Fulton, MD, Jiahui Cancer Center, Shanghai, China; Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany, Cancer Center, Qinhuai Medical District, General Hospital of Eastern Theater of PLA, Nanjing, China

Research Funding

Pharmaceutical/Biotech Company
BeiGene, Ltd., This study was sponsored by BeiGene, Ltd. Medical writing support, under the direction of the authors, was provided by Adeline Lum Nde, PhD, of Ashfield MedComms, an Inizio company, and was funded by BeiGene, Ltd

Background: TIS is a monoclonal antibody with high affinity and specificity for programmed cell death protein 1. In the phase 3 RATIONALE-301 trial (NCT03412773), TIS demonstrated non-inferior OS versus sorafenib (SOR) as 1L monotherapy for unresectable HCC (median [m] OS 15.9 [TIS] vs 14.1 [SOR] months [mo]; hazard ratio [HR] 0.85), with a favorable safety profile. Certain biomarkers are potential prognostic factors and may impact OS in 1L treatment of unresectable HCC; this exploratory analysis examined the effect of albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) grade, platelet count, platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) as predictors of OS in RATIONALE-301. Methods: Systemic therapy-naïve adults with histologically confirmed HCC (Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer Stage C or Stage B that was not amenable to or progressed after loco-regional therapy; Child-Pugh A), with ≥1 measurable lesion per RECIST v1.1, and an ECOG performance status ≤1 were randomized 1:1 to receive TIS (200 mg IV Q3W) or SOR (400 mg orally BID) until disease progression, intolerable toxicity, or withdrawal. The primary endpoint was OS. Results: Overall, 674 pts were randomized (TIS n=342; SOR n=332). At data cutoff (July 11, 2022), minimum study follow-up was 33 mo. Demographic and baseline characteristics for biomarkers were generally balanced across arms. Numerically longer (≥2 mo) mOS was observed in biomarker subgroups ALBI grade 1 vs 2 and NLR ≤3 vs >3 with TIS or SOR, and PLR ≤141 vs >141 with TIS. Both platelet count threshold subgroups were accompanied by a smaller difference (<2 mo) in mOS between biomarker cutoffs, which may indicate limited prognostic value for this biomarker. TIS also demonstrated numerically longer OS versus SOR in the same subgroup categories: ALBI grade 1, PLR ≤141, and NLR ≤3. Conclusions: This analysis suggests that ALBI grade, PLR, and NLR could have prognostic value for OS, irrespective of treatment. TIS demonstrated numerically improved mOS compared with SOR for PLR ≤141 and NLR ≤3, suggesting higher benefit for pts with a more favorable balance between systemic inflammation and immunity. Clinical trial information: NCT03412773.

No. events/
No. pts
HR for death
(95% CI)
Median OS (mo) (95% CI)
TIS SOR
ALBI grade
≥2
1

156/180
340/482

0.84 (0.61, 1.16)
0.85 (0.69, 1.06)

9.5 (7.2, 10.8)
19.9 (15.9, 24.2)

9.1 (6.2, 13.1)
16.9 (13.7, 19.8)
Platelet count
>150K
≤150K

281/378
215/284

0.84 (0.66, 1.06)
0.83 (0.63, 1.08)

14.9 (11.0, 19.8)
16.6 (13.5, 22.7)

13.5 (11.6, 18.4)
14.2 (11.6, 19.0)
PLR
>141*
≤141

204/264
292/398

0.90 (0.68, 1.19)
0.79 (0.63, 1.00)

10.5 (7.7, 16.5)
19.4 (15.2, 24.0)

13.1 (8.9, 16.0)
14.5 (13.1, 19.2)
NLR
>3
≤3

198/249
298/413

0.98 (0.74, 1.30)
0.74 (0.59, 0.93)

9.8 (7.4, 12.9)
20.9 (15.9, 25.3)

13.1 (8.7, 14.3)
15.2 (13.2, 19.2)

No., number. Intent-to-treat analysis set. *Threshold used in RATIONALE-208.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2023 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Gastrointestinal Cancer—Gastroesophageal, Pancreatic, and Hepatobiliary

Track

Gastrointestinal Cancer—Gastroesophageal, Pancreatic, and Hepatobiliary

Sub Track

Hepatobiliary Cancer - Advanced/Metastatic Disease

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT03412773

Citation

J Clin Oncol 41, 2023 (suppl 16; abstr 4083)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2023.41.16_suppl.4083

Abstract #

4083

Poster Bd #

404

Abstract Disclosures