Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
Arlene O. Siefker-Radtke , Thomas Powles , Victor Moreno , Taek Won Kang , Irfan Cicin , Angela Girvin , Sydney Akapame , Spyros Triantos , Anne O'Hagan , Wei Zhu , Meggan Tammaro , Yohann Loriot
Background: First-line (1L) therapy for cisplatin (cis)-ineligible pts with mUC remains an unmet need and includes alternative chemotherapy or anti-PD-(L)1 monotherapy for PD-L1 positive tumors. FGFRa tumors are enriched for the luminal 1 subtype with lower immune cell infiltrate and potential lower benefit from anti-PD-(L)1 monotherapy. We studied ERDA+CET in 1L, FGFRa, mUC to determine the potential impact in this setting (NCT03473743). Methods: Pts aged ≥ 18 y with mUC, susceptible FGFRa and measurable disease (no prior systemic therapy for mUC, cis-ineligible) were randomized 1:1 to once-daily ERDA 8 mg (with pharmacodynamically guided uptitration (UpT) to 9 mg) or ERDA 8 mg (no UpT) + IV CET 240 mg every 2 weeks (wks) at cycles 1-4 and 480 mg every 4 wks thereafter. Primary endpoints were investigator-assessed overall response rate (ORR) per RECIST 1.1 and safety; secondary included duration of response (DOR), time to response (TTR), progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). There were no pre-planned statistical comparisons between treatment arms. Results: As of the data cutoff, 87 pts were randomized and treated; 44 to ERDA+CET and 43 to ERDA: median age was 69 vs 72 y; visceral metastases were present in 60.0 vs 63.6%. Median follow-up time was 14.2 months (mo). ORR for ERDA+CET was 54.5% with 6 (13.6%) CRs and 12 mo OS 68%. 11/24 responders were ongoing. ORR for ERDA was 44.2% with 1 CR and 12 mo OS 56%. 9/19 responders were ongoing. 4 pts in each arm were PD-L1 positive. 3/4 (75%) PD-L1 positive pts responded to ERDA+CET vs 0 for ERDA. The most frequent treatment-emergent AEs (any grade) were hyperphosphatemia (68.9 vs 83.7%), stomatitis (59.1 vs 72.1%) and diarrhea (45.5 vs 48.8%) for ERDA+CET and ERDA respectively. Grade ≥3 treatment-related AEs occurred in 45.5 (ERDA+CET) and 46.5% (ERDA) of pts. There was one CET-related death in ERDA+CET secondary to pulmonary failure. Conclusions: Combination ERDA+CET demonstrated clinically meaningful activity and was well tolerated. These results, in 1L cis-ineligible pts, support previously described activity of ERDA monotherapy in FGFRa mUC. The safety profile was consistent with the known profile for ERDA and CET with no additive toxicity for the combination. Clinical trial information: NCT03473743.
ERDA+CET (n=44) | ERDA (n=43) | |
---|---|---|
ORR, % (95% CI) | 54.5 (38.8, 69.6) | 44.2 (29.1, 60.1) |
Confirmed CR, n (%) | 6 (13.6) | 1 (2.3) |
DCR, % (95% CI) | 79.5 (64.7, 90.2) | 88.4 (74.9, 96.1) |
Median DOR (95% CI), mo | 11.10 (8.77, NE) | 9.72 (4.60, NE) |
Median PFS (95% CI), mo | 10.97 (5.45, 13.63) | 5.62 (4.34, 7.36) |
Disclaimer
This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org
Abstract Disclosures
2024 ASCO Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium
First Author: Kohei Shitara
2023 ASCO Genitourinary Cancers Symposium
First Author: Aristotelis Bamias
2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
First Author: Nicky Wong Zhun Hong
2024 ASCO Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium
First Author: Hidekazu Hirano