Racial bias in multiple myeloma clinical trials: Racial minorities continue to miss out on treatment advances.

Authors

null

Ranjit Jasaraj

Mount Sinai Hospital, Chicago, IL

Ranjit Jasaraj , Suman Gaire , Ekaterina Proskuriakova , Ranjana Jasaraj , Amany R. Keruakous

Organizations

Mount Sinai Hospital, Chicago, IL, BP Koirala Institute of Health Sciences, Dharan, Nepal, Georgia Cancer Center, Augusta University, Augusta, GA

Research Funding

No funding received
None.

Background: Adequate representation of participants based on race and ethnicity in a clinical trial helps ensure the results' generalizability. There is a disparity in the participation of minorities in oncology clinical trials despite higher incidence and disease burden in them. The incidence of Multiple Myeloma (MM) in AA (African American) is twice as compared to White, and they are twice as likely to die from MM compared to White. Methods: We queried ClinicalTrials.gov in February 2023 for all completed interventional trials with the published results for Multiple Myeloma in the US. Demographic data were collected from all the studies. If not available, the primary manuscript was searched using the trial number. We excluded the studies involving other malignancies and conducted outside of the USA. Trials on prevention, diagnostics, supportive care, and antibiotics were also excluded. Incidence data of Multiple myeloma was obtained from the SEER database for each ethnicity and race. Results: Out of 194 trials included in our study, 133 (68.56%) reported at least either race or ethnicity. Of these trials, 83 (42.78) reported race, 124 (63.91) reported ethnicity, and 77 (39.69) reported both race and ethnicity. 5.67% of the trial participants were reported as Hispanic race. White, AA, and Asian represented 79.82%, 11.36%, and 3.10% of the trial participants, respectively. The number of trials reporting race or ethnicity has increased when comparing the trials conducted between 2001-2011 and 2012-2022 (58.3% vs. 90.3%); OR 6.4; 95% CI 2.77-17.98; p<0.001. Participation of Asians increased (2% vs. 5.5%; p<0.0005), while there were slight changes among AA (11.7% vs. 10.6%, p=0.1475), Hispanic (5.4% vs. 6%; p=0.3863), and White (80.8% vs. 77.8%, p=0.208) between 2001-2011 and 2012-2022. Conclusions: Despite ongoing efforts to improve the diversity of minorities in oncology trials, they are still under-enrolled in multiple myeloma. More studies and interventions are needed to address this disparity.

Demographic characteristics of multiple myeloma clinical trial participants between 2001 to 2022.

Number of participants in clinical trialPercent
GenderMale883657.87
Female643242.13
RaceHispanic3295.67
Non-Hispanic456778.65
EthnicityAsian3483.1
Black or AA127411.36
White895279.82
Age<65355253.64
>65307446.4

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2023 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Publication Only

Session Title

Publication Only: Hematologic Malignancies—Plasma Cell Dyscrasia

Track

Hematologic Malignancies

Sub Track

Multiple Myeloma

Citation

J Clin Oncol 41, 2023 (suppl 16; abstr e20009)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2023.41.16_suppl.e20009

Abstract #

e20009

Abstract Disclosures

Similar Abstracts

Abstract

2022 ASCO Annual Meeting

Smoldering multiple myeloma progression to multiple myeloma in a community-based population.

First Author: Raleigh Ayoolu Fatoki

Abstract

2023 ASCO Annual Meeting

Racial and ethnic representation in large B-cell lymphoma trials and real-world databases.

First Author: Javier Munoz

Abstract

2023 ASCO Annual Meeting

Health-related quality of life among patients with multiple myeloma treated with CAR-T therapy.

First Author: Samantha Jane Gagnon

Abstract

2024 ASCO Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium

Differential burdens: A study of gastric cancer hospitalization and outcomes across race and ethnicities.

First Author: Chun-Wei Pan