Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) versus adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) in patients with clinically node-positive upper tract urothelial cancer (UTUC) who underwent radical nephroureterectomy (RNU).

Authors

Karan Jatwani

Karan Jatwani

Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY

Karan Jatwani , Arya Mariam Roy , Kristopher Attwood , Anthony George , Muhammad Salman Faisal , Vasanthan Muthusamy Kumarasamy , Stuthi Perimbeti , Changchuan Jiang , Gurkamal S. Chatta , Dharmesh Gopalakrishnan

Organizations

Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY, SUNY Buffalo, Buffalo, NY

Research Funding

No funding received
None.

Background: UTUC is less common and associated with poorer stage-for-stage prognosis compared to urothelial bladder cancer. AC is regarded as a standard-of-care in high-risk UTUC based on superior disease-free survival compared to observation in the POUT trial, though fewer than 10% of patients in this trial had lymph node involvement.1 CheckMate 274 revealed lesser magnitude of benefit with adjuvant nivolumab in UTUC compared to bladder cancer on post hoc analysis.2 The preferred sequence of perioperative systemic therapy in node positive UTUC remains unclear. Methods: We queried the National Cancer Database for adult patients with clinically node positive (cTanyN1-3M0) UTUC diagnosed between 2004 and 2018. Patients were divided into two groups based on the perioperative treatment strategy - NAC or AC. Patients who did not undergo RNU were excluded from analyses. Fisher’s exact and Mann Whiney U tests were used to compare frequency distributions. Cox Proportional Hazards regression was employed for multivariate analysis of factors associated with overall survival. Models were adjusted for age, sex, race, income, educational level, clinical T stage, insurance status, and the Charlson Comorbidity Index. Results: A total of 862 patients were identified - 362 (42%) underwent NAC while 500 (58%) received AC. No significant differences were noted between the groups regarding age, sex, or insurance status. Patients with cT1-2 UTUC more often received NAC (27.9% vs 11.8%, P <0.001) while those with cT3-4 disease more frequently received AC (38.9% vs 57.4%, p<0.001). Rates of NAC vs AC were not significantly different based on clinical N stage (P = 0.35). Overall survival in the NAC group was significantly longer than the AC group (median of 47.1 vs. 20.2 months, log-rank P < 0.001). On multivariable analysis, only the sequence of perioperative chemotherapy was independently predictive of overall survival (Hazard Ratio of 1.38 for AC, with 95% CI 1.14-1.68, P = 0.001). Conclusions: In this large retrospective analysis of outcomes among patients with clinically node positive UTUC who underwent RNU, NAC was associated with significantly longer overall survival compared to AC. References: 1) Birtle A, Lancet 2020; 2) Bajorin DF, NEJM 2021.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2023 ASCO Genitourinary Cancers Symposium

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Poster Session B: Prostate Cancer and Urothelial Carcinoma

Track

Urothelial Carcinoma,Prostate Cancer - Advanced

Sub Track

Quality of Care/Quality Improvement and Real-World Evidence

Citation

J Clin Oncol 41, 2023 (suppl 6; abstr 486)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2023.41.6_suppl.486

Abstract #

486

Poster Bd #

J8

Abstract Disclosures