Influence of molecular imaging on patient selection for treatment intensification prior to salvage radiation therapy for prostate cancer: A post hoc analysis of the PROPS trial.

Authors

null

Samuel Tremblay

Laval University, Québec, QC, Canada

Samuel Tremblay , Mofarej Alhogbani , Andrew Weickhardt , Ian D. Davis , Andrew Mark Scott , Rodney J. Hicks , Ur Metser , Sue Chua , Reena Davda , Heather Ann Payne , Nina Tunariu , Bao Ho , Sympascho Young , Glenn Bauman , Louise Emmett , Frederic Pouliot , Shonit Punwani

Organizations

Laval University, Québec, QC, Canada, Laval University, Quebec, QC, Canada, Olivia Newton-John Cancer and Wellness Centre, Austin Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia, Monash University Eastern Health Clinical School, Box Hill, VIC, Australia, Department of Molecular Imaging and Therapy, Austin Health and University of Melbourne; Olivia Newton-John Cancer Research Institute and La Trobe University, Heidelberg, Australia, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia, Princess Margaret Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada, Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom, NHS, London, United Kingdom, Department of Oncology, University College London and University College London Hospital, London, United Kingdom, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust and the Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom, Department of Theranostics and Nuclear Medicine, St Vincent's Hospital; Faculty of Medicine, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, Australia, London Health Sciences Centre, London, ON, Canada, Department of Oncology, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, London, ON, Canada, St Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia, Laval University and CHU De Quebec, Quebec, QC, Canada, University College London, London, United Kingdom

Research Funding

Other Foundation
Movember Foundation Charity

Background: The impact of molecular imaging (MI) on patient management after biochemical recurrence (BCR) following radical prostatectomy has been described in many studies. However, it is not known if MI-induced management changes are appropriate. This study aimed to determine if androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) management plan is improved by MI in patients who are candidates for salvage radiation therapy. Methods: Data were analyzed from the multicenter prospective PROPS trial evaluating PSMA/Choline PET in patients being considered for salvage radiotherapy (sRT) with BCR after prostatectomy. We compared the pre- and post-MI ADT management plans for each patient and cancer outcomes as predicted by the MSKCC nomogram. A higher percentage of predicted BCR associated with ADT treatment intensification after MI was considered as an improvement in a patient’s management. Results: Seventy-three patients with a median PSA of 0.38 ng/mL were included. In bivariate analysis, a positive finding on MI (local or metastatic) was associated with decision to use ADT with an odds ratio of 3.67 (95% CI, 1.25 to 10.71; p=0.02). No factor included in the nomogram was associated with decision to use ADT. Also, MI improved selection of patients to receive ADT based on predicted BCR after sRT: the predicted nomogram 5-year biochemical-free survivals were 52.5 % and 43.3%, (mean difference, 9.2%; 95% CI 0.8 to 17.6; p=0.03) for sRT alone and ADT±sRT subgroups, while there was no statistically significant difference between subgroups before MI. Conclusions: PSMA and/or Choline PET/CT before sRT can potentially improve patient ADT management by directing clinicians towards more appropriate intensification.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2023 ASCO Genitourinary Cancers Symposium

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Poster Session A: Prostate Cancer

Track

Prostate Cancer - Advanced,Prostate Cancer - Localized

Sub Track

Diagnostics and Imaging

Citation

J Clin Oncol 41, 2023 (suppl 6; abstr 316)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2023.41.6_suppl.316

Abstract #

316

Poster Bd #

K16

Abstract Disclosures