Patient and physician preferences for adjuvant treatment of renal cell carcinoma: A discrete-choice experiment.

Authors

null

Shawna R Calhoun

Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ

Shawna R Calhoun , Caroline Vass , Kelley Myers , Kentaro Imai , Cooper Bussberg , Rituparna Bhattacharya , Cathy Anne Pinto , Christine Poulos

Organizations

Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, RTI Health Solutions, Manchester, United Kingdom, RTI Health Solutions, Research Triangle Park, NC

Research Funding

Pharmaceutical/Biotech Company
Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC, a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA

Background: Although a handful of studies have elicited treatment preferences in renal cell carcinoma (RCC), most focused on advanced disease. This study elicited United States patients’ and physicians’ preferences for adjuvant treatment characteristics. Methods: Patients with physician-confirmed RCC and (physician-defined) intermediate high or high risk of recurrence and physicians who treat such patients completed online surveys in Q1-Q2 2022 with a discrete-choice experiment. Hypothetical treatments were described by median disease-free survival (DFS); 5-year overall survival (OS) rate; mode and frequency of administration; need for concomitant daily pill; treatment duration; and the risks of severe diarrhea, fatigue, and dizziness. Preference weight estimates from random parameter logit analysis were used to calculate the conditional relative importance of attributes and risk tolerance measures. Results: 250 patients (50% post-nephrectomy) and 250 physicians (64% oncologists; 36% urologists) completed the survey. OS was the most important attribute to both patients and physicians, but DFS was also important (Table). OS had a greater influence on physicians’ choices than on patients’ choices. On average, OS was 3.2 and 2.5 times as important as DFS and 5.8-9.1 and 2.4-3 times more important than the evaluated risks for physicians and patients, respectively. Further, DFS was 1.8-2.9 times more important to physicians than the evaluated risks, while the importance of DFS and risks were nearly equivalent for patients. The need for concomitant oral medication was the least important attribute to patients and physicians. Both groups were willing to accept more than a 25-percentage-point increase in the risks of severe diarrhea, fatigue, and dizziness for improvements (from 45% to 60% or 85%) in OS. Conclusions: While both patients and physicians weighted OS improvements more than the other treatment attributes, including risks, physicians tended to place lower importance on changes in risk and administration than patients. Physicians and patients should discuss potential benefits and harms when considering adjuvant RCC therapies.

Conditional relative importance of treatment attributes.

PatientsPhysicians
AttributesCRIRatio of the importance of the attribute to OSRatio of the importance of the attribute to DFSCRIRatio of the importance of the attribute to OSRatio of the importance of the attribute to DFS
Median DFS12.10.415.70.3
5-year OS rate29.92.550.83.2
Mode of administration11.00.40.95.30.10.3
Treatment duration10.50.40.90.20.00.0
Concomitant daily pill3.20.10.35.20.10.3
Additional risk of severe diarrhea11.30.40.95.40.10.3
Additional risk of severe fatigue9.90.30.88.40.20.5
Additional risk of severe dizziness12.10.41.09.00.20.6

CRI = conditional relative importance; DFS = disease-free survival; OS = overall survival.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2023 ASCO Genitourinary Cancers Symposium

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Poster Session C: Renal Cell Cancer; Adrenal, Penile, Urethral and Testicular Cancers

Track

Renal Cell Cancer,Adrenal Cancer,Penile Cancer,Testicular Cancer,Urethral Cancer

Sub Track

Quality of Care/Quality Improvement and Real-World Evidence

Citation

J Clin Oncol 41, 2023 (suppl 6; abstr 635)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2023.41.6_suppl.635

Abstract #

635

Poster Bd #

F5

Abstract Disclosures

Similar Abstracts

First Author: Naomi B. Haas

First Author: Moshe Chaim Ornstein

First Author: Caroline Vass

First Author: Chi-Fai Ng