The optimal extent of lymph node dissection for gastric cancer with para-aortic lymph node metastases.

Authors

null

Takeyuki Wada

National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan;

Takeyuki Wada , Takaki Yoshikawa , Kenichi Ishizu , Tsutomu Hayashi , Yukinori Yamagata

Organizations

National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan; , Department of Gastric Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan;

Research Funding

No funding received
None.

Background: Gastric cancer (GC) with para-aortic lymph node (PAN) metastasis is diagnosed as stage IV and basically treated with chemotherapy. Recently, D2 and PAN dissection after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) was reportedly effective when PAN metastasis was limited within #16a2/b1 area. However, PAN dissection is highly invasive surgical procedure and it still remains unclear whether PAN dissection contributes to the survival for these tumors. This study aimed to determine the optimal extent of lymph node dissection for these tumors focusing on survival benefit of PAN dissection. Methods: The study examined patients who received radical gastrectomy with D2 and PAN dissection after NAC for gastric cancer with PAN metastasis (#16a2/b1) from 2004 to 2015. Survival benefit of lymph node dissection was estimated using therapeutic value index (TI). TI was calculated by multiplication of incidence of metastasis and 5-year survival rate of patients with metastasis for each lymph node area. TI of D2 dissection area (TI-D2) and PAN area (TI-PAN) was calculated separately. Overall survival (OS) was calculated in patients who had metastasis to PAN pathologically after surgery (pPAN+ group) and those who had not (pPAN- group). The recurrence site was also examined. Results: Thirty-two patients were analyzed. TI-D2 and TI-PAN were 15.6 and 0.0, respectively. 5y-OS was 81.0% in pPAN- group (21 cases) but was 0.0% in pPAN+ group (11 cases). The most frequent recurrence site was the lymph nodes (82.4% of all recurrences). Among lymph node recurrence, almost all recurrence patterns included the PANs (85.7% of lymph node recurrence). Conclusions: The prognosis was extremely poor when tumor cells remained on PAN after NAC. In these cases, PAN recurrence was seen most frequently even after PANs had been dissected. Patients with PAN could have the chance for the cure only when tumor cells on PAN was completely eliminated by NAC. It is unclear whether they actually needed PAN dissection for pathologically negative PAN. The optimal extent of lymph node dissection after NAC might be D2 for GC with PAN metastasis.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2023 ASCO Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Poster Session A: Cancers of the Esophagus and Stomach and Other GI Cancers

Track

Esophageal and Gastric Cancer,Other GI Cancer

Sub Track

Therapeutics

Citation

J Clin Oncol 41, 2023 (suppl 4; abstr 413)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2023.41.4_suppl.413

Abstract #

413

Poster Bd #

H16

Abstract Disclosures