Prognostic value of mismatch repair deficiency in patients receiving first-line fluoropyrimidine plus platinum chemotherapy for metastatic, recurrent, or locally advanced unresectable gastric cancer.

Authors

Chung Ryul Oh

Chung Ryul Oh

Department of Internal Medicine, Chung-Ang University Hospital, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea;

Chung Ryul Oh , Eo Jin Kim , Heejung Chae , Young Soo Park , Min-Hee Ryu , Hyung-Don Kim , Yoon-Koo Kang

Organizations

Department of Internal Medicine, Chung-Ang University Hospital, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea; , Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Seoul, South Korea; , National Cancer Center Korea, Goyang, South Korea; , Department of Pathology, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea; , Department of Oncology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea; , Asan Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea; , Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea, Republic of (South);

Research Funding

No funding received
None.

Background: In localized gastric cancer (GC), deficient mismatch repair (dMMR) tumors reportedly have a favorable prognosis. However, a potentially detrimental effect of the dMMR status was suggested in patients treated with adjuvant chemotherapy. It remains unclear whether the mismatch repair (MMR) status can impact clinical outcomes in patients with metastatic GC (mGC) receiving palliative chemotherapy. We examined the impact of the MMR status on survival outcomes of patients with HER2-negative mGC receiving first-line fluoropyrimidine plus platinum (FP) chemotherapy. Methods: We reviewed patients with histologically confirmed metastatic, recurrent, or locally advanced unresectable adenocarcinoma of the stomach or gastroesophageal junction receiving first-line FP chemotherapy between January 2015 and August 2018 at Asan Medical Center, Korea. MMR status was correlated with clinical characteristics and survival outcomes for patients with available MMR immunohistochemistry results. Results: Of 895 patients, we analyzed 543 with available MMR protein expression results, and dMMR was detected in 4.4% (n=24). Patients with dMMR exhibited a significantly higher median age than those with proficient MMR (pMMR) (64 vs. 58 years, p=0.044). No signet ring cell carcinoma (SRCC) was detected among dMMR tumors, whereas SRCC was found in 17.5% of pMMR tumors. Based on our prognostic model (Koo DH et al, 2011), only 4.2% of patients with dMMR were classified as the poor-risk group (vs. 16.8% of patients with pMMR, p=0.097). No significant difference in progression-free survival (PFS) was noted between patients with dMMR and pMMR tumors (median, 5.6 vs. 5.8 months, p=0.266). Patients with dMMR tumors tended to have better overall survival than those with pMMR tumors; this difference was not statistically significant (median, 17.9 vs. 12.2 months, p=0.183). In the good-risk subgroup, patients with dMMR tumors had a significantly worse PFS than those with pMMR tumors (median, 5.6 vs. 9.2 months, p=0.009); multivariate analysis revealed that MMR status was an independent factor for poor PFS in this subgroup. Conclusions: Survival outcomes of dMMR mGC did not differ from pMMR in patients who received first-line FP chemotherapy. However, in the good-risk subgroup, patients with dMMR tumors had a significantly shorter PFS than those with pMMR, suggesting a potentially reduced efficacy of cytotoxic chemotherapy in these patients.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2023 ASCO Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Poster Session A: Cancers of the Esophagus and Stomach and Other GI Cancers

Track

Esophageal and Gastric Cancer,Other GI Cancer

Sub Track

Tumor Biology, Biomarkers, and Pathology

Citation

J Clin Oncol 41, 2023 (suppl 4; abstr 461)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2023.41.4_suppl.461

Abstract #

461

Poster Bd #

L7

Abstract Disclosures