A study to determine enzalutamide long term safety and efficacy for men with castration-resistant prostate cancer: A multicenter, prospective DELC study.

Authors

null

Koji Hatano

Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Japan

Koji Hatano , Akira Nagahara , Wataru Nakata , Mototaka Sato , Tetsuya Takao , Soichi Matsumura , Kensaku Nishimura , Shingo Takada , Toshichika Iwanishi , Yasuyuki Kobayashi , Yu Ishizuya , Tsuyoshi Takada , Koichi Okada , Hitoshi Inoue , Motohide Uemura , Norio Nonomura

Organizations

Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Japan, Osaka Rosai Hospital, Sakai, Japan, Toyonaka Municipal Hospital, Toyonaka, Japan, Osaka General Medical Center, Osaka, Japan, Hyogo Prefectural Nishinomiya Hospital, Nishinomiya, Japan, Osaka National Hospital, Osaka, Japan, Osaka Police Hospital, Osaka, Japan, Sakai City Medical Center, Sakai, Japan, Kinki Central Hospital, Itami, Japan, Higashiosaka City Medical Center, Higashiosaka, Japan, Minoh City Hospital, Minoh, Japan, Sumitomo Hospital, Osaka, Japan, Ikeda Municipal Hospital, Ikeda, Japan, Osaka University Medical School, Suita, Japan, Osaka University Medical School, Suita, Osaka, Japan

Research Funding

Pharmaceutical/Biotech Company
Astellas Pharma Inc

Background: In the PREVAIL study, enzalutamide was demonstrated to be effective in men with chemo-naïve metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). In Japan, enzalutamide was introduced in 2014. Real-world evidence is needed for the long-term safety and efficacy of enzalutamide. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy, safety and prognostic factors in CRPC treated with enzalutamide. Methods: This multicenter, prospective, observational study enrolled 163 Japanese CRPC patients between January 2016 and March 2019. Eligibility criteria were men with chemo-naïve CRPC, no prior treatment with novel androgen receptor signaling inhibitors, and an ECOG- Performance Status ≤ 2. The switching of bicalutamide and flutamide was eligible. Written consent for participation has been obtained from the patient. Enzalutamide 160 mg/day was administered once daily according to usual practice. Data were collected from medical records at baseline and every 3 months until march 2021. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS), and factors associated with OS were examined. Cox proportional hazards model was used for statistics. The secondary endpoints were PSA response and safety. Results: At a median follow-up of 26.0 months, the median OS was 42.1 months and 24-month OS rate was 69%. Univariate analysis showed that time to CRPC, pretreatment serum PSA, baseline NSE, and baseline interleukin-6 (IL-6) levels were associated with OS. Multivariate analysis revealed that pretreatment serum PSA (hazard ratio [HR] 2.30, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.30-4.10), baseline NSE (HR 2.97, 95%CI 1.24-7.11), and baseline IL-6 (HR 2.32 95%CI 1.32-4.09) were independent risk factors for OS. PSA decline more than 50% was 74% (n=120). Fatigue (30%, n=49), constipation (20%, n=32) and appetite loss (18%, n=29) were the most common adverse events (AEs). Dose reduction/drug discontinuation rates were 20% (n=33) due to AEs and 18% (n=29) due to patient request. Conclusions: The efficacy and safety of enzalutamide in Japanese real clinical practice were comparable to those reported in PREVAIL study. The present analysis also suggests that serum PSA, NSE and IL-6 levels are independent prognostic factors in CRPC patients. Clinical trial information: UMIN000019855.

Factors associated with OS.

VariableUnivariableaMultivariablea
Age (<79 vs ≥79)1.31 [0.81, 2.12], 0.277
ECOG-PS (0 vs ≥1 )1.75 [0.97, 3.18], 0.063
Gleason sum (≤7 vs ≥8)1.32 [0.71, 2.48], 0.380
Time to CRPC (<24 vs ≥24 mos)0.40 [0.24, 0.67], <0.0010.59 [0.34, 1.03], 0.064
PSA (<11.3 vs ≥11.3 ng/ml)3.03 [1.79, 5.14], <0.0012.30 [1.30, 4.10], 0.004
Hb (≥13.7 vs <13.7 g/dl)0.82 [0.44, 1.51], 0.522
CEA (≤5.0 vs >5.0 ng/mL)0.90 [0.42, 1.89], 0.773
NSE (≤16.3 vs >16.3 ng/mL)2.58 [1.10, 6.05], 0.0302.97 [1.24, 7.11], 0.014
IL-6 (<2.15 vs ≥2.15 pg/mL)2.12 [1.28, 3.51], 0.0032.32 [1.32, 4.09], 0.004

aHazard ratio [95% CI], p value.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2023 ASCO Genitourinary Cancers Symposium

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Poster Session B: Prostate Cancer and Urothelial Carcinoma

Track

Urothelial Carcinoma,Prostate Cancer - Advanced

Sub Track

Quality of Care/Quality Improvement and Real-World Evidence

Clinical Trial Registration Number

UMIN000019855

Citation

J Clin Oncol 41, 2023 (suppl 6; abstr 66)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2023.41.6_suppl.66

Abstract #

66

Poster Bd #

D1

Abstract Disclosures