PROSPER subgroup analysis by age and region: Overall survival and safety in men with nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer receiving androgen deprivation therapy plus enzalutamide.

Authors

null

Ugo De Giorgi

Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori (IRST), IRCCS, Meldola, Italy

Ugo De Giorgi , Maha H. A. Hussain , Neal D. Shore , Karim Fizazi , Bertrand Tombal , David F. Penson , Fred Saad , Eleni Efstathiou , Katarzyna Madziarska , Joyce Leta Steinberg , Jennifer Sugg , Xun Lin , Qi Shen , Cora N. Sternberg

Organizations

Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori (IRST), IRCCS, Meldola, Italy, Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, Carolina Urologic Research Center, Myrtle Beach, SC, University of Paris Saclay, Villejuif, France, Cliniques Universitaires Saint Luc, Brussels, Belgium, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, University of Montreal Hospital Center, Montreal, QC, Canada, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland, Astellas Pharma, Inc., Northbrook, IL, Pfizer Inc., La Jolla, CA, Pfizer Inc., Collegeville, PA, Englander Institute for Precision Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY

Research Funding

Pharmaceutical/Biotech Company
Pfizer Inc. and Astellas Pharma, Inc

Background: Previous reports on the PROSPER trial have shown that enzalutamide (ENZA) plus androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) significantly improves metastasis-free survival and overall survival (OS) over placebo (PBO) in men with nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC) and rapidly rising prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels. (Hussain et al. N Engl J Med. 2018;378:2465-2474/Sternberg et al. N Engl J Med. 2020;382:2197-2206). To inform decision-making for specific patients, we report here a post hoc analysis of OS and safety in subgroups of PROSPER by age and region. Methods: PROSPER included men with nmCRPC and a PSA doubling time ≤ 10 months. Enrolled men continued ADT and were randomized 2:1 to ENZA 160 mg once daily vs PBO. We performed a multivariable analysis for OS, including age (≤ 70 yrs and > 70 yrs), geographic region, and other variables and further examined exposure-adjusted adverse events (AEs) by age and region. Results: Based on this post hoc analysis, OS benefit with ENZA treatment was similar across geographic regions (table) and for patients aged ≥ 70 yrs (hazard ratio [HR] 0.73; 95% CI 0.58-0.9) and those aged < 70 yrs (HR 0.72, 95% CI 0.5-1.04). In our multivariate analysis, 3 factors emerged as significantly impacting estimated OS: Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (1 vs 0; HR 1.7; 95% CI 1.4-2.1), log of PSA (HR 1.2; 95% CI 1.1-1.3), and use of subsequent therapy (yes vs no; HR 2.5; 95% CI 2.1-3.1). Overall safety was consistent between age groups and across geographic regions. The proportion of patients reporting any grade treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) related to ENZA use was similar between age groups but decreased with increasing age. Conclusions: In men with nmCRPC and rapidly rising PSA, ENZA plus ADT treatment reduced the risk of death, regardless of age or geographic location. Patients reported any grade TEAEs at a similar proportion in both arms. Variables impacting OS included ECOG status, log PSA, and subsequent therapy. Clinical trial information: NCT02003924

Results from a multivariate Cox analysis of factors affecting OS in men with nmCRPC treated with PBO versus ENZA.

PBO (N = 465)ENZA (N = 929)
Number (%) of patients with an event177 (38.1)285 (30.7)
Hazard ratio (95% CI) P value
Subject years at risk1502.93208.8
ECOG PS (1 vs 0)*1.728 (1.402, 2.130) P< .0001
Prior bicalutamide use (Y vs N)0.906 (0.705, 1.095) P = .3065
Albumin0.971 (0.936, 1.007) P = .1152
Hemoglobin0.995 (0.986, 1.004) P = .2475
Log (PSA)*1.185 (1.085, 1.293) P = .0002
Subsequent therapy (Y vs N)*2.543 (2.087, 3.098) P< .0001
Asia vs North American1.164 (0.824, 1.644) P = .3883
Europe vs North America0.940 (0.712, 1.241) P = .6617
Rest of World vs North America1.114 (0.822, 1.509) P = .4872
Age (≥ 70 yrs vs < 70 yrs)1.231 (0.989, 1.533) P = .0633

*Denotes statistically significant in this analysis.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2021 Genitourinary Cancers Symposium

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Poster Session: Prostate Cancer - Advanced Disease

Track

Prostate Cancer - Advanced

Sub Track

Therapeutics

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT02003924

Citation

J Clin Oncol 39, 2021 (suppl 6; abstr 84)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2021.39.6_suppl.84

Abstract #

84

Poster Bd #

Online Only

Abstract Disclosures