Sequential intravesical gemcitabine and docetaxel versus bacillus Calmette-Guérin for the treatment of high-risk, treatment-naïve, non-muscle invasive bladder cancer.

Authors

Ian McElree

Ian M. McElree

The University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, IA

Ian M. McElree , Ryan L. Steinberg , Sarah L. Mott , Michael A. O'Donnell , Vignesh T. Packiam

Organizations

The University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, IA, University of Iowa, Department of Urology, Iowa City, IA, University of Iowa Holden Comprehensive Cancer Center, Iowa City, IA

Research Funding

Other
John & Carol Walter Family Foundation and the Carver College of Medicine

Background: Due to ongoing bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) shortages, sequential intravesical gemcitabine and docetaxel (Gem/Doce) has been increasingly utilized as first-line adjuvant treatment for patients with high-risk non-muscle invasive bladder cancer. Herein, we compared oncologic outcomes and tolerance of Gem/Doce versus BCG. Methods: We retrospectively identified 312 patients with high-risk, treatment-naïve, NMIBC treated at our institution between January 2011 and December 2021; 174 treated with BCG and 138 treated with Gem/Doce. After complete TURBT, patients received a 6 weekly intravesical induction regimen of Gem/Doce or BCG, followed by maintenance if disease free at first follow-up. The primary outcome was high-grade (HG) recurrence-free survival (RFS). Cox multivariable regression analyses were performed. Adverse events were reported using CTCAE v5. Results: Median follow-up for patients receiving Gem/Doce and BCG was 23 and 49 months, respectively. Baseline clinicopathologic characteristics were similar between groups, including presence of CIS (41% vs 44%, p=0.6) and T1 (37% vs 41%, p=0.5) disease for patients receiving Gem/Doce and BCG, respectively. HG-RFS estimates at 6, 12, and 24-months were 92%, 85%, and 81% for Gem/Doce and 76%, 71%, and 69% for BCG, respectively. On multivariable Cox regression analyses controlling for age, gender, treatment year, and presence of CIS, Gem/Doce treatment was associated with superior HG-RFS (HR 0.57, p=0.04) and RFS (HR 0.56, p=0.02) versus BCG (Table). Progression-free, cystectomy-free, cancer-specific, and overall survival were similar between groups. Induction BCG was associated with greater treatment discontinuation (9.2% vs 2.9%, p=0.02), dysuria (p=0.03), and arthralgias (p=0.02), but less bladder spasms (p<0.01) than Gem/Doce, respectively. Conclusions: In the setting of ongoing BCG production shortages, we found Gem/Doce to be an efficacious and well-tolerated alternative first-line therapy for high-risk NMIBC. Prospective randomized evaluation is being planned.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2023 ASCO Genitourinary Cancers Symposium

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Poster Session B: Prostate Cancer and Urothelial Carcinoma

Track

Urothelial Carcinoma,Prostate Cancer - Advanced

Sub Track

Therapeutics

Citation

J Clin Oncol 41, 2023 (suppl 6; abstr 497)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2023.41.6_suppl.497

Abstract #

497

Poster Bd #

K1

Abstract Disclosures

Similar Abstracts

Abstract

2024 ASCO Genitourinary Cancers Symposium

Population based trends in intravesical gemcitabine use among patients with high-risk non-muscle invasive bladder cancer.

First Author: Stephen B. Williams

Abstract

2022 ASCO Genitourinary Cancers Symposium

Sequential intravesical gemcitabine and docetaxel for BCG-naïve high-risk nonmuscle-invasive bladder cancer.

First Author: Ian Mitchell McElree