Treatment patterns and their impact on the outcome of patients with HR+/HER2+ metastatic breast cancer in a large real-world cohort.

Authors

null

Marcela Carausu

Institut Curie, Saint-Cloud, France

Marcela Carausu , Matthieu Carton , Veronique C Dieras , Thierry Petit , Severine Guiu Lahaye , Corinne Veyret , Anthony Goncalves , Paule Augereau , Jean-Marc Ferrero , Christelle Levy , Mony Ung , Isabelle Desmoulins , Marc Debled , Thomas Bachelot , Jean-Christophe Eymard , Barbara Pistilli , Jean-Sebastien Frenel , Michaël Chevrot , Audrey Mailliez , Luc Cabel

Organizations

Institut Curie, Saint-Cloud, France, Institut Curie, Paris, France, Centre Eugène Marquis, Rennes, France, Centre Paul Strauss/ICANS, Strasbourg, France, Institut de Cancerologie de Montpellier, Montpellier, France, Centre Henri Becquerel, Rouen, France, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France, Institut de Cancérologie de l’Ouest, Angers, France, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France, Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France, Institut Claudius Regaud (ICR), Toulouse, France, Centre Georges-François Leclerc, Dijon, France, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France, Jean Godinot Institute, Reims, France, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France, Institut de Cancerologie de l'Ouest, Saint-Herblain, France, Unicancer, Paris, France, Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France

Research Funding

Pharmaceutical/Biotech Company

Background: The place of endocrine therapy (ET) in the treatment of hormone receptor-positive (HR+), HER2+ metastatic breast cancer (MBC) is still not clearly defined. Data suggest that blocking both HR and HER2 signaling pathways could be an efficacious strategy to overcome secondary resistance. Methods: We aimed to retrospectively evaluate the impact of first line (L1) therapy for HR+/HER2+ MBC patients (pts) included between 2008- 2017 in the French real-world ESME MBC database (NCT03275311). Our primary endpoints were median overall survival (mOS) and median first progression-free survival (mPFS1). We used descriptive statistics and the Kaplan-Meier method to report patient characteristics and outcomes. Cox proportional hazards models and a propensity score were constructed to report and adjust for prognostic factors. Results: From the 23,501 female pts in the ESME MBC cohort, 1,790 pts had HR+/HER2+ MBC treated with Trastuzumab (T, n=1,089) or Trastuzumab-Pertuzumab (TP, n=701) during L1. Among them, 1,584 pts received antiHER2 therapy+CT+/-ET and 206 pts, antiHER2+ET only. Pts with antiHER2+CT+/-ET had more often ECOG performance status 0 (29.5% vs 15.8%, p<0.001), grade III tumors (36.6% vs 25.6%, p=0.007), time to MBC < 6 mo (51.6% vs 29.1%, p<0.001), TP as antiHER2 therapy (43.2% vs 9.4%, p<0.001), ≥3 metastatic sites (23.2% vs 14.8%, p=0.007), visceral metastasis (56.5% vs 42.4%, p<0.001), and less often bone-only disease (18.4% vs 35%, p<0.001) than pts with antiHER2+ET. In multivariable analysis, antiHER2+CT+/-ET was not superior to antiHER2+ET (Table), while TP was superior to Trastuzumab, and this result was confirmed by matching pts using a propensity score (p=0.76 for mOS and p=0.85 for mPFS1). Using the time-dependent ET variable among pts with antiHER2+CT, pts with maintenance ET had significantly better PFS1 and OS than those without (adjusted HR for PFS1=0.70 [95%CI 0.60-0.82], adjusted HR for OS=0.47 [95%CI 0.39-0.57], p<0.001). Conclusions: These data suggest that endocrine therapy could be an interesting less toxic alternative to chemotherapy in combination with antiHER2 therapy as first line treatment for HR+/HER2+ MBC pts.

Univariate and multivariable analysis for OS and PFS1 for pts treated with T or TP.

Univariate
N
OS
PFS1


median
95% CI
p value
median
95% CI
p value
Trastuzumab







 antiHER2+CT+/-ET
902
58.6
54.9-63.3
0.13
13.8
12.6-15.5
0.05
 antiHER2+ET
187
48.7
42.9-63.9
10.1
8.5-14.1
TP







 antiHER2+CT+/-ET
682
88.9
78.0-NR
0.93
23.1
21.0-27.1
0.69
 antiHER2+ET
19
NR
37.8-NR
18.6
9.9-NR
Multivariable analysis*

HR


HR


AntiHER2 therapy







 TP
675
1

<0.001
1

<0.001
 Trastuzumab
1,048
1.66
1.38-1.99
1.44
1.28-1.63
Treatment group







 antiHER2+ET
203
1

0.8
1

1
 antiHER2+CT+/-ET
1,520
1.03
0.82-1.28
1
0.84-1.19

*The multivariable analysis also included: tumor grade, age at MBC, time to MBC, no of metastatic sites, type of metastases, ECOG performance status.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2022 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Breast Cancer—Metastatic

Track

Breast Cancer

Sub Track

HER2-Positive

Citation

J Clin Oncol 40, 2022 (suppl 16; abstr 1043)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2022.40.16_suppl.1043

Abstract #

1043

Poster Bd #

421

Abstract Disclosures