University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA
Zhaohui Jin , Jesse G. Dixon , Joleen M. Hubbard , Cathy Eng , Christopher Hanyoung Lieu , Jean-Yves Douillard , Richard Adams , Timothy S. Maughan , Eric Van Cutsem , Alan P. Venook , Heinz-Josef Lenz , Volker Heinemann , Sebastian Stintzing , Richard S. Kaplan , Carsten Bokemeyer , Benoist Chibaudel , John Raymond Zalcberg , Takayuki Yoshino , Aimery De Gramont , Qian Shi
Background: Early onset colorectal cancer (eoCRC: disease diagnosed < 50) has been increasing over the past 2 decades. Currently, standard treatment recommendations for eoCRC patients (pts) with metastatic disease does not differ from late-onset CRC (loCRC) pts although outcomes data in eoCRC pts is limited. Methods: Individual patient data on 5,761 treatment-naive metastatic eoCRC pts was pooled from 8 phase II and III randomized EGFRi studies (2000 - 2012) from the ARCAD mCRC database. The distribution of demographics, clinicopathological features, and biomarkers were summarized by age groups. Progression-free survival (PFS) was compared between age groups by stratified Cox models, adjusting for potential confounders. Predictive value of age group was evaluated by testing interaction effect between treatment and age variables based on a subset of trials with concurrent randomizations between regimens with and without EGFRi Results: eoCRC (n=756) were more evenly distributed between gender, had improved performance status (PS), increased likelihood of metastatic resection, and distant lymph node metastasis, but were less likely to have lung metastasis or KRAS mutation compared to loCRC (n=5,005, table 1). eoCRC and loCRC patients had similar distribution of primary tumor sidedness, primary resection, liver and/or peritoneal involvement, number of metastatic sites involved, and BRAF mutations (MT). No difference in PFS for eoCRC versus loCRC pts was noted (7.8 vs. 7.9 months [M], adjusted hazard ratio [HRadj], 1.02, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.93-1.11). Among pts with KRAS wild type (WT) and left sided primary tumors, univariable analysis of EGFRi demonstrated improved mPFS in loCRC (9.9 vs 8.5M, HR = 0.74, p<0.001), but this benefit was not seen in eoCRC (8.3 vs 8.9 months, HR 1.20, p=0.36). The same pattern was observed upon multivariable analysis (Table). Conclusions: In our pooled analysis, EGFRi + chemotherapy significantly improved PFS in treatment-naïve loCRC patients but not in left sided, KRAS WT, eoCRC patients. Further validation in an independent cohort is warranted.
Age group | eoCRC | loCRC | HRadj (95% CI) | p-value |
---|---|---|---|---|
Female % (n) | 48 (362) | 35 (1755) | <0.0001 | |
ECOG Performance score = 0 % (n) | 60 (453) | 51 (2548) | <0.0001 | |
Prior Metastasectomy % (n) | 10 (34) | 7 (184) | 0.016 | |
Lung metastases % (n) | 32 (141) | 39 (1240) | 0.004 | |
Distant lymph node metastases % (n) | 49 (144) | 42 (1109) | 0.044 | |
KRAS MT % (n) | 32 (240) | 36 (1794) | 0.028 | |
BRAF MT % (n) | 8.2 (49) | 8.3 (343) | 0.92 | |
KRAS and BRAF WT % (n) | 63 (374) | 60 (2485) | 0.55 | |
EGFRi effects on PFS (Differencein months) (n)1 | −0.6 (162) | 1.20 (0.81-1.78)2 | 0.362 | |
1.4 (1049) | 0.74 (0.64-0.85)2 | <0.00012 |
1Median PFS in EGFRi arm minus that in non-EGFRi arm. 2Adjusted for PS, sex, and KRAS status.
Disclaimer
This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org
Abstract Disclosures
2024 ASCO Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium
First Author: Hideaki Bando
2024 ASCO Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium
First Author: Ramya Thota
2021 ASCO Quality Care Symposium
First Author: Catherine Dunn
2024 ASCO Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium
First Author: Thierry Andre