Response to epithelial growth factor receptor inhibitor (EGFRi) treatment in patients with early-onset, treatment-naïve metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC): An ARCAD database analysis.

Authors

null

Zhaohui Jin

University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA

Zhaohui Jin , Jesse G. Dixon , Joleen M. Hubbard , Cathy Eng , Christopher Hanyoung Lieu , Jean-Yves Douillard , Richard Adams , Timothy S. Maughan , Eric Van Cutsem , Alan P. Venook , Heinz-Josef Lenz , Volker Heinemann , Sebastian Stintzing , Richard S. Kaplan , Carsten Bokemeyer , Benoist Chibaudel , John Raymond Zalcberg , Takayuki Yoshino , Aimery De Gramont , Qian Shi

Organizations

University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, Department of Health Science Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, TN, University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, CO, University of Nantes, and Integrated Centers of Oncology ICO René Gauducheau Cancer, Nantes, France, Cardiff University and Velindre Cancer Centre, Cardiff, United Kingdom, MRC Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium, University of California, San Francisco, CA, Division of Medical Oncology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Department of Medicine III, and Comprehensive Cancer Center Munich, Munich, Germany, Charité– Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Hematology, Oncology, and Cancer Immunology (CCM), Berlin, Germany, Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, London, United Kingdom, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany, Department of Medical Oncology, Franco-British Institute, Levallois-Perret, France, School of Public Health and Preventative Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia, Department of Gastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan, Department of Medical Oncology, Franco-British Hospital, Levallois-Perret, France, Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN

Research Funding

No funding received

Background: Early onset colorectal cancer (eoCRC: disease diagnosed < 50) has been increasing over the past 2 decades. Currently, standard treatment recommendations for eoCRC patients (pts) with metastatic disease does not differ from late-onset CRC (loCRC) pts although outcomes data in eoCRC pts is limited. Methods: Individual patient data on 5,761 treatment-naive metastatic eoCRC pts was pooled from 8 phase II and III randomized EGFRi studies (2000 - 2012) from the ARCAD mCRC database. The distribution of demographics, clinicopathological features, and biomarkers were summarized by age groups. Progression-free survival (PFS) was compared between age groups by stratified Cox models, adjusting for potential confounders. Predictive value of age group was evaluated by testing interaction effect between treatment and age variables based on a subset of trials with concurrent randomizations between regimens with and without EGFRi Results: eoCRC (n=756) were more evenly distributed between gender, had improved performance status (PS), increased likelihood of metastatic resection, and distant lymph node metastasis, but were less likely to have lung metastasis or KRAS mutation compared to loCRC (n=5,005, table 1). eoCRC and loCRC patients had similar distribution of primary tumor sidedness, primary resection, liver and/or peritoneal involvement, number of metastatic sites involved, and BRAF mutations (MT). No difference in PFS for eoCRC versus loCRC pts was noted (7.8 vs. 7.9 months [M], adjusted hazard ratio [HRadj], 1.02, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.93-1.11). Among pts with KRAS wild type (WT) and left sided primary tumors, univariable analysis of EGFRi demonstrated improved mPFS in loCRC (9.9 vs 8.5M, HR = 0.74, p<0.001), but this benefit was not seen in eoCRC (8.3 vs 8.9 months, HR 1.20, p=0.36). The same pattern was observed upon multivariable analysis (Table). Conclusions: In our pooled analysis, EGFRi + chemotherapy significantly improved PFS in treatment-naïve loCRC patients but not in left sided, KRAS WT, eoCRC patients. Further validation in an independent cohort is warranted.

Age group
eoCRC
loCRC
HRadj (95% CI)
p-value
Female % (n)
48 (362)
35 (1755)

<0.0001
ECOG Performance score = 0 % (n)
60 (453)
51 (2548)

<0.0001
Prior Metastasectomy % (n)
10 (34)
7 (184)

0.016
Lung metastases % (n)
32 (141)
39 (1240)

0.004
Distant lymph node metastases % (n)
49 (144)
42 (1109)

0.044
KRAS MT % (n)
32 (240)
36 (1794)

0.028
BRAF MT % (n)
8.2 (49)
8.3 (343)

0.92
KRAS and BRAF WT % (n)
63 (374)
60 (2485)

0.55
EGFRi effects on PFS (Differencein months) (n)1
−0.6 (162)

1.20 (0.81-1.78)2
0.362

1.4 (1049)
0.74 (0.64-0.85)2
<0.00012

1Median PFS in EGFRi arm minus that in non-EGFRi arm. 2Adjusted for PS, sex, and KRAS status.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2022 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Gastrointestinal Cancer—Colorectal and Anal

Track

Gastrointestinal Cancer—Colorectal and Anal

Sub Track

Colorectal Cancer–Advanced Disease

Citation

J Clin Oncol 40, 2022 (suppl 16; abstr 3572)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2022.40.16_suppl.3572

Abstract #

3572

Poster Bd #

366

Abstract Disclosures