Genomic aberrations associated with overall survival (OS) in metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC) treated with apalutamide (APA) or placebo (PBO) plus androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) in TITAN.

Authors

Neeraj Agarwal

Neeraj Agarwal

Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT

Neeraj Agarwal , Justin Lucas , Clemente Aguilar-Bonavides , Shibu Thomas , Michael Gormley , Simon Chowdhury , Axel S. Merseburger , Anders Bjartell , Hirotsugu Uemura , Mustafa Özgüroğlu , Sharon McCarthy , Sabine D. Brookman-May , Florence Lefresne , Suneel Mundle , Kim N. Chi

Organizations

Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, Janssen Research & Development, Spring House, PA, Guy's, King's, and St. Thomas' Hospitals, and Sarah Cannon Research Institute, London, United Kingdom, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Osaka, Japan, Istanbul University-Cerrahpaşa, Cerrahpaşa School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey, Janssen Research & Development, Raritan, NJ, Janssen Research & Development, Los Angeles, CA and Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany, Janssen Research & Development, Los Angeles, CA, BC Cancer; Vancouver Prostate Centre, Vancouver, BC, Canada

Research Funding

Pharmaceutical/Biotech Company

Background: TITAN, a phase 3 PBO-controlled study in patients (pts) with mCSPC, showed APA + ADT improved radiographic progression-free survival and OS vs PBO + ADT. In this exploratory analysis, we report the relationships between biomarkers and OS in TITAN. Methods: Circulating tumor (ct)DNA and genomic aberrations in 17 PC-related genes, including androgen receptor (AR), were assessed at baseline (BL; 114 pts) and end of study treatment (EOST; 129 pts) using next-generation sequencing. ctDNA was assessed qualitatively; genomic aberrations were assessed within ctDNA-positive samples as inactivation (heterozygous/homozygous deletion or single nucleotide variant [SNV]) or activation (amplification or SNV). Associations of detected ctDNA/aberrations at BL or EOST with OS, and biomarkers at EOST with OS on subsequent therapies, were evaluated using univariate or multivariate analyses and Cox proportional hazards model; results were stratified by treatment arm. Results: Among pts from both treatment groups, 36% had detectable ctDNA, of which 27% had any genomic AR aberration and 24% had AR gene amplification at BL; prevalence of these biomarkers increased significantly from BL to EOST (Table). The most prevalent non-AR aberrations at BL (TP53, homologous recombination repair [HRR] pathway, PTEN, RB1, and PIK3CA genes) increased at EOST but not significantly (Table). Among assessed aberrations, presence of ctDNA or any AR genomic aberrations at BL (HR, 1.9 or 6.7; all p < 0.05) and any AR genomic aberrations or PI3K pathway activation at EOST (1.7, p < 0.05 or 2.2, p < 0.001) was significantly associated with poor OS in multivariate analyses from both treatment groups. In univariate analyses of pts who received subsequent therapy (chemotherapy: 106; hormonal therapy: 161), worse OS was associated only with PIK3CA activation, PI3K pathway activation, or TP53 inactivation at EOST (3.7, p < 0.05; 2.4, p < 0.05; 3.0, p < 0.01, respectively) in chemo-treated pts. A small sample size in some biomarker subgroups limits interpretation. Conclusions: These hypothesis-generating data from TITAN show that presence of ctDNA or select AR and non-AR biomarkers at BL or EOST were associated with poor OS. The predictive value of these biomarkers for survival in mCSPC needs further confirmation. Clinical trial information: NCT02489318.

Aberrations with ≥ 15% prevalence at BL from both treatment groups
BL, n/n (%)
EOST, n/n (%)
Pearson's Χ2
p valued
ctDNA
41/114 (36)
97/129 (75)
< 0.001
Any genomic AR aberration
11/41 (27)
65/97 (67)
< 0.001
AR amplification
10/41 (24)
61/97 (63)
< 0.001
TP53a
17/41 (41)
52/97 (54)
0.2
HRR pathwaya,c
9/41 (22)
26/97 (27)
0.5
RB1a
8/41 (20)
32/97 (33)
0.11
PTENa
8/41 (20)
31/97 (32)
0.14
PIK3CAb
6/41 (15)
29/97 (30)
0.06

aInactivation. bActivation. cIncludes: BRCA1, BRCA2, FANCA, BRIP1, HDAC2, CDK12, ATM, PALB2, and CHEK2.dEOST vs BL.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2022 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Genitourinary Cancer—Prostate, Testicular, and Penile

Track

Genitourinary Cancer—Prostate, Testicular, and Penile

Sub Track

Prostate Cancer– Advanced/Hormone-Sensitive

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT02489318

Citation

J Clin Oncol 40, 2022 (suppl 16; abstr 5066)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2022.40.16_suppl.5066

Abstract #

5066

Poster Bd #

249

Abstract Disclosures

Similar Abstracts

First Author: Philip C. Mack

First Author: Eli Tran