A phase I/II study of nivolumab and axitinib in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma.

Authors

null

Matthew R. Zibelman

Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA

Matthew R. Zibelman , Michael Anthony Carducci , Yasser Ged , Ana M. Molina , Rahul Ravilla , David R. Shaffer , Courtney Lambert , Mahvish Tafseer , Rachel Basiura , Danielle Weismann , Rutika Kokate , Karthik Devarajan , Karen Ruth , R. Katherine Alpaugh , Fern Anari , Pooja Ghatalia , Daniel M. Geynisman , Elizabeth R. Plimack

Organizations

Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, Johns Hopkins Kimmel Cancer Ctr, Baltimore, MD, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, Albany Medical Center, Albany, NY, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Temple University Health System, Philadelphia, PA

Research Funding

Pharmaceutical/Biotech Company

Background: Combination systemic therapy with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and an immune checkpoint inhibitor (IO) are an established standard of care for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). We performed a phase I/II study to investigate the safety and efficacy combining the TKI axitinib (axi) with the IO agent nivolumab (nivo). Methods: This phase I/II study investigated the combination of axi and nivo in an initial dose finding phase I portion with a 3+3 design to determine the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of axi. The phase II portion included 2 parallel arms: treatment naïve mRCC patients and mRCC patients previously treated with TKIs alone or IO/IO combination (NCT03172754). We are presenting results from the treatment naïve arm only. Included patients had to have histology with any clear cell component, ECOG performance status of 0-1, no known or symptomatic brain metastases, and no history of autoimmune disease. The RP2D of axi was 5 mg BID from the phase I portion and patients could be treated for up to 2 years. The primary endpoint of the phase II portion was objective response rate (ORR) per investigator assessment. Results: Forty-four patients were accrued to the treatment naïve arm. One withdrew consent and was replaced but is included in the safety analysis, while 42 patients are evaluable for efficacy. The median age was 65 yrs (range: 42-84 yrs) and the group was predominantly male (83.7%) and white (95.3%). Using the IMDC risk group grading, 18 patients (41.9%) were favorable risk, 22 patients (51.2%) were intermediate risk and 3 patients (7 %) were poor risk. Median follow-up was 11.5 months. Best response data is shown in the table and is notable for an ORR of 69.0%, with only 1 patient (2.4%) experiencing primary progressive disease, for a disease control rate of 97.6%. Median progression free survival was 16.4 months (95% CI: 10.6 - 21.9 mo), and median overall survival (OS) was not reached. OS at 12 months was 86.7%. Adverse event (AE) data was similar to published data for IO/TKI combinations, with no grade 4-5 AEs. Twenty-nine patients experienced a grade 3 AE (70.7%), the most common of which was hypertension, and 14.0% discontinued the study due to treatment-related toxicity. Conclusions: The combination of axi/nivo for treatment naïve patients with mRCC demonstrated efficacy comparable to available IO/TKI combinations with a similar safety profile. Clinical trial information: NCT03172754.

Best Response
N (%)
Complete Response
1 (2.4%)
Partial Response
28 (66.7%)
Stable Disease
12 (28.6%)
Progressive Disease
1 (2.4%)
Not Evaluable
1(n/a)

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2022 ASCO Genitourinary Cancers Symposium

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Poster Session C: Renal Cell Cancer; Adrenal, Penile, Urethral, and Testicular Cancers

Track

Renal Cell Cancer,Adrenal Cancer,Penile Cancer,Testicular Cancer,Urethral Cancer

Sub Track

Therapeutics

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT03172754

Citation

J Clin Oncol 40, 2022 (suppl 6; abstr 291)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2022.40.6_suppl.291

Abstract #

291

Poster Bd #

D2

Abstract Disclosures