Study EV-103 cohort L: Evaluating perioperative enfortumab vedotin monotherapy in cis-ineligible muscle invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) (trial in progress).

Authors

Christopher Hoimes

Christopher J. Hoimes

Duke Cancer Center, Durham, NC

Christopher J. Hoimes , Thomas W. Flaig , Sandy Srinivas , Nataliya Mar , Daniel P. Petrylak , Peter H. O'Donnell , Mehmet Asim Bilen , Carolyn Sasse , Yao Yu , Matthew Birrenkott , Jonathan E. Rosenberg

Organizations

Duke Cancer Center, Durham, NC, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, CA, University of California Irvine, Orange, CA, Yale Cancer Center, New Haven, CT, University of Chicago Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chicago, IL, Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, Astellas US, Northbrook, IL, Seagen Inc., Bothell, WA, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY

Research Funding

Pharmaceutical/Biotech Company

Background: The current standard of care for patients (pts) with newly diagnosed MIBC is neoadjuvant cisplatin (cis)-based chemotherapy followed by radical cystectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection (RC+PLND). For the 20-50% pts who are cis-ineligible, the current standard of care is RC+PLND alone (Galsky Future Oncol 2021). Adjuvant therapy is currently recommended for cis-ineligible patients with high-risk features at cystectomy. Due to the high rates of recurrence in cis-ineligible pts with RC+PLND alone, there is a need to develop new therapies in this setting. Enfortumab vedotin (EV), an antibody-drug conjugate, delivers the microtubule-disrupting agent monomethyl auristatin E to cells expressing Nectin-4, which is highly expressed in urothelial cancer. In EV-301, a phase 3 study, EV showed an overall survival (OS) benefit vs chemotherapy in pts with locally advanced (la) or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) who had previously received platinum-based therapy and a PD-1 or PD-L1 inhibitor (Powles NEJM 2021). EV has also demonstrated activity and a tolerable safety profile in cis-ineligible pts with la/mUC (Yu Lancet Oncol 2021). Given the efficacy of EV in la/mUC, it is being evaluated as perioperative therapy in cis-ineligible MIBC in EV-103 cohort L. Methods: Study EV-103 (NCT03288545) la/mUC and MIBC cohorts were described previously (Hoimes ASCO 2019; Hoimes ASCO-GU 2020). Cohort L was added to evaluate EV monotherapy (n = 50) as perioperative therapy in cis-ineligible pts with MIBC (cT2-T4aN0M0 or cT1-T4aN1M0). Eligible pts are previously untreated for MIBC, ECOG 0-2, have CrCl ≥30 mL/min, and are medically fit for and agree to undergo curative intent RC+PLND. Pts with pT1 disease are eligible only if they have N1 disease. Pts receive 3 cycles of neoadjuvant EV (1.25 mg/kg IV) on Days 1 and 8 of each 3-week cycle, followed by RC+PLND and then 6 cycles of adjuvant EV starting 8 weeks post-RC on the same schedule. Pathological complete response rate per central pathology review is the primary endpoint. Secondary endpoints include event-free survival and disease-free survival by blinded independent central review and investigator, pathological downstaging rate per central pathology review, OS, safety and tolerability. Cohort L is currently enrolling pts in the US and Canada. Clinical trial information: NCT03288545.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2022 ASCO Genitourinary Cancers Symposium

Session Type

Trials in Progress Poster Session

Session Title

Trials in Progress Poster Session B: Urothelial Carcinoma

Track

Urothelial Carcinoma

Sub Track

Therapeutics

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT03288545

Citation

J Clin Oncol 40, 2022 (suppl 6; abstr TPS587)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2022.40.6_suppl.TPS587

Abstract #

TPS587

Poster Bd #

Online Only

Abstract Disclosures