Enfortumab vedotin (EV) alone or in combination with pembrolizumab (P) in previously untreated cisplatin-ineligible patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial cancer (la/mUC): Subgroup analyses of confirmed objective response rate (cORR) from EV-103 cohort K.

Authors

null

Peter H. O'Donnell

University of Chicago Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chicago, IL

Peter H. O'Donnell , Jonathan E. Rosenberg , Christopher J. Hoimes , Daniel P. Petrylak , Matthew I. Milowsky , Rana R. McKay , Sandy Srinivas , Terence W. Friedlander , Chethan Ramamurthy , Mehmet Asim Bilen , Earle F Burgess , Nataliya Mar , Helen Moon , Daniel M. Geynisman , Saby George , Anne-Sophie Carret , Yao Yu , Maria Guseva , Blanca Homet Moreno , Thomas W. Flaig

Organizations

University of Chicago Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chicago, IL, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, Yale Cancer Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, University of North Carolina, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, NC, Moores Cancer Center, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, Stanford University School of Medicine, Division of Oncology, Stanford, CA, University of California, San Francisco Medical Center, San Francisco, CA, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA, Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC, University of California Irvine Medical Center, Orange, CA, SCPMG-Kaiser, Riverside, CA, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY, Seagen Inc., Bothell, WA, Astellas Pharma Inc, Naperville, IL, Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, University of Colorado Comprehensive Cancer Center, Aurora, CO

Research Funding

Pharmaceutical/Biotech Company
Seagen Inc., Astellas Pharma, Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC, a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc

Background: In EV-103 Cohort K (NCT03288545), EV and P in combination (EV+P) showed encouraging antitumor activity and a manageable safety profile when used as 1L therapy in patients (pts) w/ la/mUC who are ineligible for cisplatin, a population w/ high unmet need. Here we report results of an analysis of prespecified Cohort K subgroups known to be associated w/ poor outcomes. Methods: Pts who are cisplatin-ineligible w/ previously untreated la/mUC were randomized 1:1 to EV (1.25 mg/kg) as monotherapy on Days 1 and 8 or in combination w/ P (200 mg) on Day 1 of 3-week cycles. Primary endpoint is cORR per RECIST v1.1 by blinded independent central review w/ no formal statistical comparison between arms. Secondary endpoints included duration of response and safety (e.g. treatment-related adverse events, TRAEs). The cORR analysis was performed in prespecified subgroups including age, ECOG PS, liver metastasis, PD-L1 expression status, metastatic disease site at baseline, and primary disease site of origin. Results: 149 pts were treated: EV+P n=76; EV n=73; cORRs across key subgroups for both EV+P and EV monotherapy are shown in the table. For EV+P overall cohort, cORR (95%CI): 64.5% (52.7, 75.1); median DOR was not reached. cORRs were consistent across subgroups for EV+P including those w/ ECOG PS score of 1-2: 62.8% (46.7, 77.0) and presence of liver metastasis: 53.8% (25.1, 80.8). Among TRAEs of special interest in the EV+P arm, skin reactions occurred in n=51 (67.1%); peripheral neuropathy occurred in n=46 (60.5%). For EV+P, 68.4% of pts had TRAEs leading to interruption of either EV or P; 48.7% of pts had TRAEs leading to EV dose reduction. Median duration of EV+P treatment was 11 cycles. Conclusions: EV+P showed promising cORR in 1L cisplatin-ineligible pts w/ la/mUC; activity was consistently observed across a range of pre-specified subgroups including those with poor prognosis. EV+P TRAEs were manageable w/ close monitoring and appropriate dose modifications w/ a meaningful duration of treatment. EV+P has the potential to address high unmet needs in 1L la/mUC and MIBC and is being further evaluated in 3 Phase 3 trials (NCT04223856, NCT04700124, NCT03924895). Clinical trial information: NCT03288545.

cORR by Subgroup, % (95% CI)
EV + P
(n=76)


n/N
EV Monotherapy
(n=73)


n/N
Overall64.5 (52.7, 75.1)49/7645.2 (33.5, 57.3)33/73
Age ≥ 65 years64.4 (50.9, 76.4)38/5948.4 (35.5, 61.4)30/62
ECOG PS = 1-262.8 (46.7, 77.0)27/4344.4 (29.6, 60.0)20/45
Visceral metastases165.6 (52.7, 77.1)42/6446.7 (33.7, 60.0)28/60
Liver metastasis = Yes53.8 (25.1, 80.8)7/1353.8 (25.1, 80.8)7/13
Upper tract primary disease site of origin60.0 (40.6, 77.3)18/3042.9 (21.8, 66.0)9/21
PD-L1 expression CPS <1061.4 (45.5, 75.6)27/4450.0 (33.4, 66.6)19/38

1Includes liver metastases.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2023 ASCO Genitourinary Cancers Symposium

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Poster Session B: Prostate Cancer and Urothelial Carcinoma

Track

Urothelial Carcinoma,Prostate Cancer - Advanced

Sub Track

Therapeutics

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT03288545

Citation

J Clin Oncol 41, 2023 (suppl 6; abstr 499)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2023.41.6_suppl.499

Abstract #

499

Poster Bd #

K3

Abstract Disclosures