Gustave Roussy and University of Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France
Karim Fizazi , Neal D. Shore , Matthew Raymond Smith , Rodrigo Ramos , Robert J. Jones , Guenter Niegisch , Egils Vjaters , Jorge A. Ortiz , Steve Liang , Yuan Wang , Shankar Srinivasan , Toni Sarapohja , Frank Verholen
Background: Patients (pts) with nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC) are primarily older, have comorbidities, and take concomitant medications. Darolutamide (DARO), a structurally distinct and highly potent androgen receptor inhibitor, significantly reduced the risk of metastasis by ̃2 years and the risk of death by 31% versus placebo (PBO) and demonstrated favorable safety and tolerability in the phase 3 ARAMIS trial. DARO also has low potential for drug−drug interactions. This post hoc analysis of ARAMIS evaluated overall survival (OS) and safety in pts with ongoing comorbidities and concomitant medications. Methods: Pts with nmCRPC were randomized 2:1 to DARO (n=955) or PBO (n=554) while continuing androgen-deprivation therapy. At the final data cutoff (Nov 15, 2019), OS and adverse events (AEs) were evaluated in pts with a median of ≤ and >6 comorbidities or ≤ and >10 concomitant medications in the double-blind period. HRs (95% CIs) were determined from univariate analysis using Cox regression. Results: The majority of pts had ≥6 comorbidities (53%; 795/1509) or received ≥10 concomitant medications (54%; 813/1509). For pts with ≤6 and >6 comorbidities, DARO prolonged OS vs PBO (HR 0.65 and 0.73, respectively). OS benefit of DARO vs PBO was consistent for pts with metabolic, cardiovascular (CV), and other comorbid disorders (HR range: 0.39–0.88). For pts receiving ≤10 and >10 concomitant medications, OS was prolonged with DARO vs PBO (HR 0.76 and 0.66, respectively). Subgroups of pts receiving concomitant medications for gastrointestinal/metabolic disorders, CV disease, urologic disorders, and pain/inflammation achieved similar OS benefit with DARO vs PBO (HR range: 0.45–0.80). Incidence of AEs and AEs leading to treatment discontinuation with DARO was comparable to PBO across subgroups by number of comorbidities and concomitant medications (Table). Conclusions: The OS benefit and safety of DARO remained consistent with that observed in the overall ARAMIS population, even in patients with a high number of comorbidities or concomitant medications. Clinical trial information: NCT02200614.
n (%) | Overall ARAMIS Population | ≤6 Comorbidities | >6 Comorbidities | ≤10 Concomitant Medications | >10 Concomitant Medications | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DARO (N=954a) | PBO (N=554) | DARO (n=538) | PBO (n=326) | DARO (n=405) | PBO (n=222) | DARO (n=481) | PBO (n=270) | DARO (n=464) | PBO (n=273) | |
Any AE | 818 (86) | 439 (79) | 447 (83) | 242 (74) | 336 (90) | 195 (88) | 371 (77) | 184 (68) | 442 (95) | 248 (91) |
Grade 3 or 4 AE | 251 (26) | 120 (22) | 127 (24) | 58 (18) | 124 (31) | 61 (28) | 67 (14) | 36 (13) | 183 (39) | 82 (30) |
AE leading to permanent study drug discontinuation | 85 (9) | 48 (9) | 43 (8) | 20 (6) | 42 (10) | 28 (13) | 35 (7) | 17 (6) | 50 (11) | 29 (11) |
aOne pt randomized to DARO did not receive treatment and was excluded from the safety analysis.
Disclaimer
This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org
Abstract Disclosures
2021 Genitourinary Cancers Symposium
First Author: Tomasz M. Beer
2024 ASCO Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium
First Author: Akihito Kawazoe
2023 ASCO Genitourinary Cancers Symposium
First Author: Koji Hatano
2023 ASCO Genitourinary Cancers Symposium
First Author: Neal D. Shore