Analysis of racial disparities in time to treatment initiation and survival among patients with advanced cancers.

Authors

null

Teresa Maria Zyczynski

Bristol-Myers Squibb, Skillman, NJ

Teresa Maria Zyczynski, Cardinale B. Smith, Ying Zhang, Yi Hao

Organizations

Bristol-Myers Squibb, Skillman, NJ, Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Tisch Cancer Institute at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ

Research Funding

No funding received
None

Background: Racial disparities in cancer care have received increased attention in recent years. One previously identified disparity is in the time to treatment initiation (TTI) – a factor closely associated with outcomes. While most research in the US to date has focused on the Medicaid and Medicare populations, this study examined disparities between different racial/ethnic groups in TTI and overall survival (OS) among patients with cancer managed in the community setting. Methods: Using the Flatiron Health electronic health record database, patients diagnosed with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (aNSCLC), metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), metastatic breast cancer (mBC), multiple myeloma (MM), advanced gastroesophageal cancer (aGastric), advanced urothelial cancer (aUL), metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) or advanced melanoma (aMel) and treated with first-line (1L) therapy, with ≥1 month of follow-up during 2014-2019, were included. Patient characteristics, TTI and outcomes were compared across race/ethnicity groups classified as White, Black, Asian and Hispanic/Latino/Other (Other). Results: A total of 81,543 patients were evaluated (37% aNSCLC, 19% mCRC, 15% mBC, 8% MM, 6% aGastric, 5.2% aUL, 5.0% mRCC and 4.1% aMel); 67% were White, 9% Black, 3% Asian and 11% Other. Overall, TTI was similar across race/ethnicity groups (median range 1.1–1.2 months), and 44% of all patients received treatment ≤30 days post-diagnosis. Overall Survival (months). Median OS varied by tumor and race/ethnicity groups (Table). However, multivariate Cox proportional hazards analysis showed that Asian patients had better OS than Black patients in many cancers (hazard ratio [HR] 0.8 aNSCLC, 0.75 mBC, 0.63 aGastric, 0.59 aUL, 0.81 mCRC, 0.68 mRCC), while White patients had better survival than Black patients in mBC (HR 0.8) and aGastric (HR 0.87). Conclusions: In this real-word analysis, TTI did not differ by race/ethnicity group for any of the cancers examined. However, some differences in OS emerged on multivariate analysis – this was longer in Asian than Black patients in aNSCLC, mBC, mCRC, aGastric, aUL and mRCC, and longer in White than Black patients in mBC and aGastric. Given the small sample size in some groups, further analyses are needed to determine the influence of race/ethnicity on cancer care and outcomes.


White
Black
Asian
Other
aNSCLC
11.4
13
23.3
11.6
mCRC
20.8
20.4
25.8
21.3
mBC
31.4
23.7
40.5
31.6
MM
58.6
63.9
NA
60.4
aGastric
11.2
10.2
13.7
11.2
aUL
10.6
11.7
22.1
10.9
mRCC
20.5
15.8
24.4
21.4
aMel
20.7
13.2
8.8
20.8

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2021 ASCO Quality Care Symposium

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Poster Session A: Cost, Value, and Policy; Health Equity and Disparities; Patient Experience

Track

Cost, Value, and Policy,Technology and Innovation in Quality of Care,Health Care Access, Equity, and Disparities,Patient Experience,Quality, Safety, and Implementation Science

Sub Track

Health Disparities

Citation

J Clin Oncol 39, 2021 (suppl 28; abstr 127)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2020.39.28_suppl.127

Abstract #

127

Poster Bd #

D20

Abstract Disclosures

Similar Abstracts

First Author: Alexandra Gangi

First Author: Katherine K Benson

First Author: Renee Maria Saliby