Background: Cancer therapies are leveraging oral targeted treatments over traditional cytotoxic chemotherapy (CT) at an increasing rate. Compared to CT, use of oral antineoplastic treatments (OATs) shift some of the burden of medication management onto patients. To address these challenges, several health systems have developed multidisciplinary OAT management teams or ‘clinics’ whereby an Oncology Clinical Pharmacist (OCP) collaborates with oncology teams to ensure optimal use of these agents. Through the VA MISSION Act of 2018, Veterans can be prescribed treatments in the community which are dispensed by VA. These Veterans often live in rural areas and may lack access to comprehensive medication management resources. Methods: The VA CARES Program is a telemedicine medication management ‘clinic’ and care delivery model for patients receiving OATs leveraging custom designed health information technology (HIT) tools to remotely coordinate OAT related care. Veterans are automatically enrolled in the program if they have OATs prescribed by community providers which are to be dispensed by VA. An OCP provides telemedicine medication management services. The OCP performs a screening assessment, ensures appropriate indication and dosing, reviews baseline laboratory results, and performs a thorough drug-drug interaction analysis. The OCP then provides OAT education. Throughout the duration of therapy the OCP ensures necessary therapeutic monitoring, and regularly follows up with the Veterans. Subsequent encounters are to assess knowledge, adherence, toxicities, new drug-drug interactions, and need for OAT refills. The outcome measures for the VA CARES Program include safety (number and type of pharmacist interventions), economic benefits (cost savings or cost avoidance), and patient satisfaction. Results: In the initial 13 months, the VA CARES Program screened N = 78 and enrolled N = 64 (82%) Veterans from three VA medical facilities in VISN-19 from January 2020 to January 2021. The CPS performed n = 342 telemedicine visits and n = 80 interventions leading to improved safety, effectiveness, and/or an economical benefit. The most common interventions included detection and/or prevention of drug-drug interactions (n = 45) and adverse events (n = 18), drug not indicated (n = 13), alternative therapy suggested (n = 7), and limited-quantity dispensed (n = 7). The CPS interventions saved an estimated $210,864 in medication-related costs or avoidance. The Veterans surveyed were highly satisfied with the program services. Conclusions: Telemedicine delivery of oncology medication management by an OCP across systems is feasible, and provides clinical and economic benefits.