Efficacy of AI and palbociclib in ER+ HER2- advanced breast cancer patients relapsing during adjuvant tamoxifen: An exploratory analysis of the PADA-1 trial.

Authors

null

François-Clément Bidard

Institut Curie, Paris, France

François-Clément Bidard , Florence Dalenc , Thibault De La Motte Rouge , Barbara Pistilli , Caroline Cheneau , Catherine Delbaldo , Olfa Derbel , Claire Garnier Tixidre , Nathalie Marques , Sandrine Marques , Lionel Moreau , Frederique Berger , J Lemonnier , Anne-Claire Hardy-Bessard , Suzette Delaloge , Thomas Bachelot

Organizations

Institut Curie, Paris, France, Institut Claudius Regaud–IUCT Oncopole, Toulouse, France, Centre Eugène Marquis, Rennes, France, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France, Centre Hospitalier Bretagne Sud, Lorient, France, Hopital Diaconesses-Croix Saint Simon, Paris, France, Institut de Cancérologie, Hôpital Privé Jean Mermoz, Lyon, France, Groupe Hospitalier Mutualiste de Grenoble, Grenoble, France, Centre Hospitalier Métropole de Savoie, Chambéry, France, Unicancer, Paris, France, Pôle Santé République, Clermont-Ferrand, France, Biostatistics Unit, INSERM U900, Institut Curie, Paris, France, Medical Oncology Department, CARIO-HPCA and Cooperative Gynecological Cancer Research Group (GINECO), Plerin, France, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France

Research Funding

Pharmaceutical/Biotech Company
Pfizer

Background: In PADA-1 (NCT03079011), a phase III trial testing the clinical utility of ESR1mut detection, ER+ HER2- advanced breast patients (ABC pts) received Aromatase Inhibitor (AI) and Palbociclib (Pal) +/- LHRH agonist as first line therapy. PADA-1 was open to “AI-sensitive” pts, including those with de novo stage IV disease or metastatic relapse after adjuvant endocrine therapy but also pts with metastatic relapses during adjuvant tamoxifen (TAM). In this subsidiary analysis, we report the efficacy of AI+PAL as first line therapy in patients relapsing on adjuvant TAM. Methods: Main inclusion criteria in PADA-1 are: pre- or post-menopausal pts with ER+ HER2- ABC, who did not receive any prior therapy for ABC and who had no adjuvant AI or completed adjuvant AI for > 12 months or who had disease recurrence while on adjuvant TAM. Results: From 04/2017 to 01/2019, 1017 ABC pts have been included in PADA-1, of which 115 (11.3%) had a metastatic relapse while on adjuvant TAM (TAM only (N = 112) or TAM+GnRH agonist (N = 3)). Median age at inclusion was 46 years (range 25-81), and 58 (50.4%) patients had visceral disease. The median PFS under AI+PAL was 20.4 months (95%CI16.1;27.8) in patients relapsing during adjuvant TAM. In contrast, median PFS in patients with de novo metastatic disease and metastatic relapses after the completion of adjuvant endocrine therapy were 30.6 months (95%CI26.7;Not reached) and 27.8 months (95%CI24.1;30.)], respectively. A subgroup analysis among patients relapsing on adjuvant TAM showed that those relapsing during the first two years of adjuvant TAM had a shorter PFS (11.4 months 95%CI[8.7;20.7]) than those relapsing after 2 years of adjuvant TAM (23.8 months 95%CI[20.2;Not reached]). Conclusions: To our knowledge, these are the first data on first line AI+CDK4/6 inhibitor in patients relapsing on adjuvant TAM. While PFS on AI + PAL appears primarily driven by endocrine resistance status, our data show that AI+PAL is a valuable option also in patients relapsing during adjuvant TAM. Clinical trial information: NCT03079011.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2021 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Breast Cancer—Metastatic

Track

Breast Cancer

Sub Track

Hormone Receptor-Positive

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT03079011

Citation

J Clin Oncol 39, 2021 (suppl 15; abstr 1070)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2021.39.15_suppl.1070

Abstract #

1070

Poster Bd #

Online Only

Abstract Disclosures