Detection of FGFR3 alt in plasma cfDNA in metastatic UC patients receiving Erda therapy.

Authors

Michal Sarfaty

Michal Sarfaty

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY

Michal Sarfaty , Min Yuen Teo , Samuel Aaron Funt , Chung-Han Lee , David Henry Aggen , Neha Ratna , Ashley Marie Regazzi , Andrew Thomas Lenis , Ziyu Chen , Hikmat A. Al-Ahmadie , Angela Rose Brannon , Michael F. Berger , David B. Solit , Jonathan E. Rosenberg , Dean F. Bajorin , Gopa Iyer

Organizations

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, Genitourinary Medical Oncology Service, Division of Solid Tumor Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY

Research Funding

U.S. National Institutes of Health
U.S. National Institutes of Health

Background: The pan-FGFR inhibitor erdafitinib (erda) is FDA-approved for pretreated mUC pts harboring FGFR2/3 alterations. We explored concordance of FGFR3 alt profiles between primary tumor and cfDNA using the next generation sequencing assay MSK-ACCESS. We also correlated changes in FGFR3 cfDNA mutant allele fraction (MAF) with response to erda. Methods: After consent on an approved biomarker protocol, plasma samples were collected from mUC pts on erda at baseline, on treatment (tx), and at progression along with patient clinical characteristics. Baseline tumors were sequenced with MSK-IMPACT and plasma samples sequenced with MSK-ACCESS, a cfDNA platform that sequences select exons and introns of 129 genes and uses unique molecular indexes to detect somatic mutations down to 0.1% MAF. Results: Between 8/2019-12/2020, 18 pts started erda 8mg daily and had plasma drawn for MSK-ACCESS. Three pts increased to 9mg daily, 7 required dose reductions and 10 had dose interruptions. Treatment was discontinued in 13 pts for disease progression and 3 for toxicity. Median PFS was 3.7 months. FGFR3 S249C was the most frequent alt detected (11/18, 61%), then Y373C (3/18, 16%), and R248C (2/18, 11%) (Table). FGFR3 alt were detected in 15/18 (83%) baseline plasma samples, all of which were of the same alt as tumor tissues. In 3 samples, additional FGFR3 alt were detected, including 1 pt with an FGFR3-TACC3 fusion and hotspot mutations found only in cfDNA. FGFR3 MAF decreased in 7 of 9 pts on erda, 2 of whom declined to undetectable levels. Conclusions: A high degree of concordance of FGFR3 alt was observed between primary tumors and cfDNA. Most erda responders displayed reduction of FGFR3 cfDNA MAF. FGFR3 alts exclusive to cfDNA were found in a small subset of pts. Further pt accrual and follow-up are ongoing to assess for correlations between erda response/progression and changes in FGFR3 cfDNA MAF, and to assess whether cfDNA can identify resistance mechanisms.

Patient #
Tumor
cfDNA Pre Tx

(mutant allele, MAF)
cfDNA On Tx

(mutant allele, MAF)
cfDNA At Progression

(mutant allele, MAF)
Best Response
1
FGFR3 - TACC3 fusion
U
ND
ND
CR
2
S249C
S249C 1.2%
S249C < 1%
On tx
PR (no PD)
3
S249C
S249C 5.6%
S249C < 1%
ND
PR (no PD)
4
S249C
S249C 6.6%
K650M < 1%
S249C < 1%
ND
PR
5
S249C
S249C 1.4%
S249C 3%
ND
PR
6
S249C
S249C < 1%

L645V < 1%
S249C 2%

L645V 2%
S249C 24%

L645V 19%
S424C 39%
PR
7
S249C
S249C 23%
ND
ND
PR
8
S249C
U
ND
ND
PR
9
S249C

E332Q
U
ND
ND
PR
10
Y373C
Y373C 6.2%
Y373C 1%
ND
PR
11
Y373C
Y373C 11%
U
ND
PR
12
Y373C
Y373C < 1%
U
ND
PR
13
S371C
S371C 4%

S249C < 1%
R399C < 1%
R248C 1.5%
FGFR3 - TACC3 fusion
R669G < 1%
FGFR3 - TACC3 fusion
S249C 2.5%

R399C < 1%

R669G < 1%

R248C < 1%
V553M < 1%
K649_K650delinsIE < 1%

PR
14
S249C
S249C < 1%
ND
S249C < 1%
PD
15
S249C
S249C 2%
ND
U
PD
16
S249C
S371C < 1%
S249C 7.5%
ND
ND
PD
17
R248C
R248C 16%
R248C 10%
ND
PD
18
R248C
R248C 29.5%
ND
ND
PD

U = Undetected ND = Not done.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2021 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Publication Only

Session Title

Publication Only: Genitourinary Cancer—Kidney and Bladder

Track

Genitourinary Cancer—Kidney and Bladder

Sub Track

Bladder Cancer

Citation

J Clin Oncol 39, 2021 (suppl 15; abstr e16519)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2021.39.15_suppl.e16519

Abstract #

e16519

Abstract Disclosures

Similar Abstracts

Abstract

2023 ASCO Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium

Clinical application of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in patients with metastatic gastric cancer.

First Author: Moonki Hong

Abstract

2024 ASCO Genitourinary Cancers Symposium

Evaluation of ctDNA in patients with mCRPC with liver metastases.

First Author: Minqi Huang

First Author: Charlie Saillard