Davidoff Cancer Center, Rabin Medical Center, Petah Tikva, Israel
Michal Sarfaty , Min Yuen Teo , Samuel Aaron Funt , Chung-Han Lee , David Henry Aggen , Neha Ratna , Ashley Marie Regazzi , Hikmat Al-Ahmadie , Angela Rose Brannon , Michael F. Berger , David B. Solit , Jonathan E. Rosenberg , Dean F. Bajorin , Gopa Iyer
Background: The pan-FGFR inhibitor erda was recently FDA-approved for pretreated mUC pts harboring FGFR2/3 alterations. We explored concordance of FGFR3 mutation profiles between the primary tumor and cfDNA using the MSK-ACCESS platform. We also correlated changes in FGFR3 cfDNA mutant allele fraction (MAF) with response to drug. Methods: Plasma samples were collected from mUC pts started on erda at baseline, on treatment (tx), and at progression. Demographic and clinical characteristics were obtained. Baseline tumors were sequenced with MSK-IMPACT (ref) and plasma samples were sequenced using MSK-ACCESS, a cfDNA platform that sequences 129 genes using unique molecular indexes to generate > 15,000x coverage and detection of somatic mutations down to 0.1% MAF. Results: Between 08/2019-1/2020, 11 pts received erda 8mg daily. Of these, 3 pts increased dose to 9mg daily based on phosphorus level, 4 required dose reductions and 6 dose interruptions. In 5 pts, erda was discontinued for disease progression. FGFR3 S249C was the most frequent alteration detected (64%) followed by Y373C (18%), R248C and S371C (both 9%). Pre-treatment plasma FGFR3 profiles were concordant with tissue in 91% (10/11) of pts and additional FGFR3 mutations were detected in 3 cases (27%, Table), including 1 pt with an FGFR3-TACC3 fusion and hotspot mutations only in cfDNA. In 2 responding pts, the mutant allele was undetectable on erda. Conclusions: A high degree of concordance between primary tumor and cfDNA FGFR3 mutation detection was observed. FGFR3 mutations exclusive to cfDNA were found in a subset of pts. Further pt accrual and follow-up are ongoing to assess for correlations between erda response and tx-related changes in cfDNA MAF, and to assess whether cfDNA can identify resistance mechanisms.
Patient # | Tumor | cfDNA Pre Tx (mutant allele, MAF) | cfDNA On Tx (mutant allele, MAF) | cfDNA At Progression (mutant allele, MAF) |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Y373C | Y373C 11% | Undetected | On Tx |
2 | S249C | S249C 1.4% | S249C 3% | N/A |
3 | S371C | S371C 4%; | R669G < 1%; | R399C < 1% |
R399C < 1%; | FGFR3 - TACC3 fusion | V553M < 1% | ||
R248C 1.5%; | K649_K650delinsIE < 1% | |||
S249C < 1%; | R669G < 1% | |||
FGFR3 - TACC3 fusion | R248C < 1% | |||
S249C 2.5% | ||||
4 | R248C | R248C 16% | R248C 10% | N/A |
5 | S249C | L645V < 1%; | L645V 2%; | S424C 39% |
S249C < 1% | S249C 2% | L645V 19% | ||
S249C 24% | ||||
6 | S249C | S249C < 1% | N/A | S249C < 1% |
7 | S249C | S249C 6.6% | K650M < 1%; | On Tx |
S249C < 1% | ||||
8 | Y373C | Y373C < 1% | Undetected | On Tx |
9 | S249C | S249C 23% | N/A | N/A |
10 | S249C | S371C < 1%; | N/A | On Tx |
S249C 7.5% | ||||
11 | S249C | Undetected | N/A | On Tx |
N/A = Not available.
Disclaimer
This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org
Abstract Disclosures
2021 ASCO Annual Meeting
First Author: Michal Sarfaty
2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
First Author: Clara Helal
2017 ASCO Annual Meeting
First Author: Michael L. Cheng
2018 Genitourinary Cancers Symposium
First Author: Bradley Alexander McGregor