Background: In the phase 3 CM 9ER trial (NCT03141177), N+C significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS; HR 0.51, 95% CI 0.41–0.64; p < 0.0001), overall survival (OS; HR 0.60, 98.89% CI 0.40–0.89; p = 0.0010), and objective response rate (p < 0.0001) vs S in 1L aRCC (Choueiri, 2020). N+C was generally well tolerated with low rates of treatment-related discontinuations, indicating successful adverse event (AE) management with dose modification to maintain tolerability. Here the impact of C exposure on efficacy and safety outcomes in CM 9ER was evaluated using ER analysis. Methods: Patients (pts, N = 320) with previously untreated aRCC received C 40 mg QD in combination with N 240 mg Q2W; dose reductions of C to 20 mg QD or 20 mg Q2D were allowed to manage AEs. Time-to-event Cox proportional hazard ER models were developed to characterize the relationship between predicted C exposure or apparent clearance (CL/F) and specified endpoints, including PFS, dose modification, and select AEs (palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia [PPE; Gr ≥1], diarrhea [Gr ≥3], hypertension [Gr ≥3], fatigue/asthenia [Gr ≥3], and ALT/AST elevation [Gr ≥3]). C exposure was defined as the overall average concentration from time zero to the time of event or censoring (CAVG) and estimated by population pharmacokinetic modeling for a typical patient. ER analysis for OS was not done due to the low number of events at the database lock date (March 30, 2020). Results: In the ER analysis of PFS, predicted C exposure at 40-mg and 20-mg QD doses was not significantly associated with the rate of progression or death (HR 1.00, 95% CI 0.78–1.27, for 20-mg vs 40-mg dose). In the ER analysis of AEs, lower predicted C exposure was significantly associated with lower rates of PPE (HR 0.63, 95% CI 0.50–0.78, for 20-mg vs 40-mg dose) and diarrhea (HR 0.48, 95% CI 0.29–0.80) but was not significantly associated with the rates of hypertension, fatigue/asthenia, or ALT/AST elevation. Higher predicted C CL/F was associated with a lower rate of C dose modification; however, this association was not statistically significant (HR 0.80, 95% CI 0.57–1.12, for CL/F 3.2 vs 1.2 L/hr). Conclusions: In ER models of pts with 1L aRCC treated with the combination of N+C, C exposure was not significantly associated with PFS; however, higher C exposure was associated with higher rates of PPE and diarrhea. ER modeling predicts that a starting dose of 40 mg QD C in combination with N with appropriate dose modifications to manage C AEs will not adversely affect the efficacy of the combination in 1L aRCC. Clinical trial information: NCT03141177