TIVO-3: Age-related tolerability outcomes of tivozanib versus sorafenib in metastatic relapsed or refractory renal cell carcinoma, a subgroup analysis of the TIVO-3 clinical trial.

Authors

null

Bernard Escudier

Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France

Bernard Escudier , Brian I. Rini , Sumanta K. Pal , David F. McDermott , Camillo Porta , Elena Verzoni , Michael B. Atkins , Michael N. Needle , Thomas E. Hutson

Organizations

Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, TN, Department of Medical Oncology & Therapeutics, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Dana-Farber/Harvard Cancer Center, Boston, MA, University of Bari 'A. Moro' and Policlinico Consorziale di Bari, Bari, Italy, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milan, Italy, Georgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Washington, DC, Aveo Oncology, Boston, MA, Texas A&M College of Medicine, Bryan, TX

Research Funding

Pharmaceutical/Biotech Company
AVEO Oncology

Background: Tivozanib (TIVO) is a potent and selective VEGF receptor (R) tyrosine kinase inhibitor with a long half-life designed to optimize the VEGF blockade while minimizing off-target toxicities. The TIVO-3 trial demonstrated improved progression-free survival (PFS) when compared to sorafenib (SOR; 5.6 mo. vs 3.9 mo., respectively) with a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.73. TIVO showed better tolerability with reduced need for dose interruptions (p = 0.0164) and dose reductions (p = 0.0147) as compared to SOR. Methods: Data was analyzed to identify relationships between and age or prior use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (CPI). Results: Of the 343 patients treated on study, 120 (35%) were between age 65 and 75 and 34 (10%) were over 75. Adverse events were less frequent for TIVO compared to SOR in all age groups and drug exposure was consistently greater in the TIVO arm. Of particular interest, the tolerability advantages noted in the total population are also observed in the patients 75 and over with almost half the rate of the adverse drug reactions leading to dose reduction or discontinuation compared to SOR. Patients treated with prior CPI had an increased need for dose adjustment, but dose adjustments were less common with TIVO than SOR in CPI exposed and naïve patients. Conclusions: Tivozanib was better tolerated than sorafenib regardless of age or prior CPI treatment. Dose adjustments and interruptions are more common after prior CPI. Clinical trial information: NCT02627963


All
Age < 65
Age 65-74
Age > / = 75
Prior IO
No prior IO

TIVO

(n = 173)
SOR

(n = 170)
TIVO

(n = 97)
SOR

(n = 92)
TIVO

(n = 61)
SOR

(n = 59)
TIVO

(n = 15)
SOR

(n = 19)
TIVO

(n = 48)
SOR

(n = 43)
TIVO

(n = 125)
SOR

(n = 127)
Drug Exposure (mean cycles)
11.9
6.7
10.1
6.7
15
6.6
11.2
7.3
12.3
5.5
11.7
7.2
Dose interruption (%)
50
64
41
51
59
80
73
74
69
81
43
57
Dose reduction (%)
25
39
20
26
33
51
33
63
33
35
22
40
Dose discontinuation (%)
21
30
26
25
15
36
20
37
25
40
20
27
TRAE Gr 3/4 (%)
46
55
38
46
56
68
53
63
58
67
41
51

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2021 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Publication Only

Session Title

Publication Only: Genitourinary Cancer—Kidney and Bladder

Track

Genitourinary Cancer—Kidney and Bladder

Sub Track

Kidney Cancer

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT02627963

Citation

J Clin Oncol 39, 2021 (suppl 15; abstr e16553)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2021.39.15_suppl.e16553

Abstract #

e16553

Abstract Disclosures

Similar Abstracts