TIVO-3: Subgroup analysis of progression-free survival of tivozanib compared to sorafenib in subjects with refractory advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC).

Authors

null

Camillo Porta

Department of Internal Medicine, University of Pavia and Division of Traslational Oncology, IRCCS Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri, Pavia, Italy

Camillo Porta , Elena Verzoni , Bernard Escudier , Sumanta K. Pal , Michael B. Atkins , Thomas E. Hutson , Michael N. Needle , David F. McDermott , Brian I. Rini

Organizations

Department of Internal Medicine, University of Pavia and Division of Traslational Oncology, IRCCS Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri, Pavia, Italy, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milan, Italy, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA, Georgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Washington, DC, Baylor Sammons Cancer Center-Texas Oncology, Dallas, TX, Aveo Oncology, Cambridge, MA, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland, OH

Research Funding

Pharmaceutical/Biotech Company

Background: Tivozanib (T) is a biochemically potent and highly selective VEGF tyrosine kinase receptor inhibitor in clinical development in RCC. The TIVO-3 trial in 3rd and 4th line subjects with metastatic (m) RCC showed a median progression free survival (mPFS) of 5.6 months (mos) for T compared to 3.9 mos for sorafenib (S) (p = 0.017, HR = 0.73). Methods: Subjects with mRCC who failed 2 or 3 prior systemic regimens, one of which included a VEGFR TKI other than S or T, were stratified by IMDC risk category and type of prior therapy (two TKIs; TKI plus checkpoint; TKI + other) then randomized in a 1:1 ratio to T or S. The primary objective was to compare PFS by blinded independent radiological review. Pre-specified subgroups included prior treatment, IMDC prognostic group, and demographic characteristics. Results: Tivozanib demonstrated PFS benefit in all subgroups including men, women, patients over 65, and under 65. The hazard ratio was the same for patients enrolled in North America and the EU. Patients with ECOG performance status (PS) of 0 had a lower HR than patients with ECOG PS of 1. There was an increase in HR from IMDC favorable vs IMDC intermediate vs IMDC poor. PFS favored tivozanib in patients who had two prior lines of therapy, those treated with three prior lines, those with a prior checkpoint inhibitor, or with two prior VEGFR TKIs. Conclusions: Tivozanib improved PFS vs. sorafenib across several subgroups in TIVO-3. Patients with favorable and intermediate IMDC risk and ECOG PS 0 seemed to derive the most benefit. Patients treated with a prior checkpoint inhibitor or two VEGFR-TKIs had a longer PFS than patients treated on sorafenib. Clinical trial information: NCT02627963

SubgroupHRSubgroupHR
Male0.64IMDC Favorable0.46
Female0.72IMDC Intermediate0.69
Age ≤650.74IMDC Poor1.15
Age >650.59Two prior VEGFR-TKIs0.57
ECOG 00.54Prior Checkpoint Ab0.55
ECOG 10.873rd Line0.69
North America0.714th Line0.64
EU0.69HR < 1 favors tivozanib

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2019 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Genitourinary (Nonprostate) Cancer

Track

Genitourinary Cancer—Kidney and Bladder

Sub Track

Kidney Cancer

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT02627963

Citation

J Clin Oncol 37, 2019 (suppl; abstr 4572)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2019.37.15_suppl.4572

Abstract #

4572

Poster Bd #

398

Abstract Disclosures