GlaxoSmithKline, Navy Yard, PA
Jinan Liu , Premal H. Thaker , Janvi Sah , Eric M. Maiese , Oscar Bee , Jean Hurteau , John Chan
Background: With the advent of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi), options for first-line (1L) maintenance therapy in ovarian cancer (OC) have evolved in the US. This study described the use of 1L maintenance and assessed predictors of 1L maintenance use among PARPi-eligible patients (pts) with OC in a real-world setting. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included pts with newly diagnosed stage III/IV epithelial OC who received 6?9 cycles of 1L platinum-based chemotherapy (PBC) and primary or interval debulking surgery following neoadjuvant chemotherapy between Jan 1, 2016, and Feb 29, 2020, from the nationwide Flatiron Health electronic health record?derived deidentified database. The end of the last cycle of 1L PBC was defined as the index date. Those pts who started second-line chemotherapy within 2 months of the index date were excluded. Logistic regression was used to analyze variables with regard to 1L maintenance use. Results: In total, 463 pts were included; 21% received maintenance therapy, 79% received active surveillance. Baseline characteristics are shown in the table. Overall maintenance therapy use increased over the study period, from 7.7% to 37.7%. Pts with BRCA wild type were significantly less likely to receive maintenance therapy (odds ratio [OR]: 0.30; 95% CI, 0.16?0.59) than pts with BRCA mutation. Pts treated in 2018 (OR: 2.73; 95% CI, 1.25?5.98) and 2019 (OR: 8.78; 95% CI, 4.15?18.55) were significantly more likely to receive maintenance therapy than pts treated in 2017. Age, race, practice type, ECOG score, and residual disease status were not significant predictors of 1L maintenance use. Conclusions: Nearly 40% of pts with advanced stage OC received upfront maintenance therapy with an increasing trend over time, particularly in those with biomarker guidance. Research is warranted toward addressing barriers to the appropriate use of maintenance therapy.
Characteristic, n (%) | Pts receiving 1L maintenance therapy | Pts not receiving 1L maintenance therapy |
---|---|---|
Overall | 97 (21.0) | 366 (79.0) |
Age, mean, years | 63.8 | 66.2 |
Race Asian Black White Other race/missing | 1 (20.0) 4 (13.8) 68 (20.1) 24 (26.7) | 4 (80.0) 25 (86.2) 271 (79.9) 66 (73.3) |
Practice type Community Academic institution | 90 (22.2) 7 (12.3) | 316 (77.8) 50 (87.7) |
ECOG score 0?1 2?4 Missing | 82 (22.8) 7(23.3) 8 (10.8) | 277 (77.2) 23 (76.7) 66 (89.2) |
Residual disease status Residual disease No residual disease Missing | 37 (17.8) 35 (23.0) 25 (24.3) | 171 (82.2) 117 (77.0) 78 (75.7) |
BRCA status BRCAm BRCAwt Other/missinga | 28 (37.8) 64 (20.4) 6 (12.2) | 46 (62.2) 249 (79.6) 43 (87.8) |
Homologous recombination test status HRd HRp Unknown/missing | 4 (22.2) 7 (38.9) 86 (20.1) | 14 (77.8) 11 (61.1) 341 (79.9) |
aIncludes genetic variant of unknown significance, BRCA mutation NOS, other, and missing. HRd, homologous recombination deficient; HRp, homologous recombination proficient.
Disclaimer
This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org
Abstract Disclosures
2021 ASCO Quality Care Symposium
First Author: Jinan Liu
2021 ASCO Quality Care Symposium
First Author: Jinan Liu
2023 ASCO Quality Care Symposium
First Author: Dana Meredith Chase
2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
First Author: Yanglong Guo