Reasons for first-line maintenance therapy discontinuation among patients with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer treated in real-world settings.

Authors

null

Jinan Liu

GlaxoSmithKline, Navy Yard, PA

Jinan Liu, Premal H. Thaker, Janvi Sah, Eric M Maiese, Linda Kalilani, Rajesh Mallampati, Jean Hurteau, John Chan

Organizations

GlaxoSmithKline, Navy Yard, PA, Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, STATinMED Research, Ann Arbor, MI, Epidemiology, Oncology, GlaxoSmithKline, Durham, NC, STATinMED, Ann Arbor, MI, GlaxoSmithKline, Waltham, MA, California Pacific/Palo Alto Medical Foundation/Sutter Health, San Francisco, CA

Research Funding

Pharmaceutical/Biotech Company
GlaxoSmithKline

Background: PARP inhibitor (PARPi) and bevacizumab have been integrated into the first-line (1L) maintenance therapy for patients (pts) with ovarian cancer (OC). However, due to adverse events, the rate of PARPi maintenance discontinuation was 12% in the SOLO1 clinical trial. We aimed to better understand the rate and cause of maintenance therapy discontinuation in real-world practice. Methods: This retrospective cohort study was conducted using de-identified electronic health record (EHR)–derived data from the nationwide Flatiron Health electronic health database. From January 1, 2016, to February 29, 2020, data were obtained for pts with newly diagnosed stage III/IV epithelial OC who received primary debulking surgery followed by 6–9 cycles of 1L platinum-based chemo or neoadjuvant chemo followed by interval debulking surgery. Index date was the end of 1L systemic therapy. Results: Of 675 pts with stage III/IV OC who underwent primary systemic therapy, 144 (21.3%) received 1L maintenance therapy and were included in the analysis. Mean age was 65.0 y. Most pts were treated in community practice (93.1%), had ECOG score of 0–1 at diagnosis (81.3%), and were shown to be BRCA wild type (66.7%). Bevacizumab was the most common 1L maintenance therapy (n = 69, 47.9%), followed by olaparib (n = 46, 31.9%), paclitaxel (n = 18, 12.5%), rucaparib (n = 10, 6.9%), and gemcitabine (n = 1, 0.7%). Overall, 34 (23.6%) pts discontinued 1L maintenance therapy. The most common reason for discontinuation was disease progression (n = 19, 13.2%), followed by treatment-related toxicity (n = 13, 9.0%; Table). Of 56 pts who received PARPi (olaparib or rucaparib) 1L maintenance therapy, 21 (37.5%) pts discontinued treatment: 11 (19.6%) because of disease progression, 9 (16.0%) treatment-related toxicity, and 1 for other reasons. Conclusions: In pts with advanced OC who received 1L maintenance therapy in clinical practice, disease progression was the most common reason for maintenance therapy discontinuation. The rates of toxicity-related discontinuations were comparable with those reported in clinical trials.

Pts on 1L maintenance therapy
PARPi (n = 56)
Totala(N = 144)
Pts who discontinued 1L maintenance therapy, n (%)
21 (37.5)
34 (23.6)
Reasons for 1L maintenance therapy discontinuation, n (%)


 Progression
11 (19.6)
19 (13.2)
 Treatment-related toxicity
9 (16.0)
13 (9.0)
 Pt request
0
0
 Disease-related symptoms not due to therapy
0
1 (0.7)
 Completed treatment
0
0
 Financial
0
0
 Other
1 (1.8)
1 (0.7)

aIncludes pts who received PARPi, bevacizumab, paclitaxel, or gemcitabine as 1L maintenance therapy.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2021 ASCO Quality Care Symposium

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Poster Session B: Patient Experience; Quality, Safety, and Implementation Science; Technology and Innovation in Quality of Care

Track

Technology and Innovation in Quality of Care,Patient Experience,Quality, Safety, and Implementation Science,Cost, Value, and Policy,Health Care Access, Equity, and Disparities

Sub Track

Real-World Evidence

Citation

J Clin Oncol 39, 2021 (suppl 28; abstr 290)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2020.39.28_suppl.290

Abstract #

290

Poster Bd #

Online Only

Abstract Disclosures