Two dosing regimens of nivolumab (NIVO) plus ipilimumab (IPI) for advanced (adv) melanoma: Three-year results of CheckMate 511.

Authors

null

Celeste Lebbe

APHP Dermatology and CIC, U976, Université de Paris, Hôpital Saint-Louis, Paris, France

Celeste Lebbe , Nicolas Meyer , Laurent Mortier , Ivan Marquez-Rodas , Caroline Robert , Piotr Rutkowski , Marcus O. Butler , Thomas Eigentler , Alexander M. Menzies , Michael Smylie , Ana Maria Arance , Paolo Antonio Ascierto , Inge Marie Svane , Mazhar Ajaz , Nikhil I. Khushalani , Maurice Lobo , Jesus Zoco , Jacopo Pigozzo

Organizations

APHP Dermatology and CIC, U976, Université de Paris, Hôpital Saint-Louis, Paris, France, Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse and Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU), Toulouse, France, Universite Lille, Centre Hospitalier Regional Universitaire de Lille, Lille, France, Medical Oncology, General University Hospital Gregorio Marañón & CIBERONC, Madrid, Spain, Gustave Roussy and Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif-Paris, France, Department of Soft Tissue/Bone Sarcoma and Melanoma, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland, Tumor Immunotherapy Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany, Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, and Mater and Royal North Shore Hospitals, Sydney, NSW, Australia, Medical Oncology and Clinical Research, Cross Cancer Institute, Edmonton, AB, Canada, Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Clinic Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale, Naples, Italy, Herlev Gentofte Hospital, Herlev, Denmark, Royal Surrey County Hospital, University of Surrey, Guildford, United Kingdom, Department of Cutaneous Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ, Syneos Health, Braine L'alleud, Belgium, Medical Oncology, IOV - Istituto Oncologico Veneto-IRCCS, Padua, Italy

Research Funding

Pharmaceutical/Biotech Company
Bristol Myers Squibb

Background: NIVO 1 mg/kg plus IPI 3 mg/kg (NIVO1 + IPI3) is approved for treatment (tx) of unresectable/adv melanoma, with demonstrated durable clinical benefit on long-term follow-up. Analysis of the phase 3b/4 CheckMate 511 study (NCT02714218) at 1 y showed that NIVO 3 mg/kg plus IPI 1 mg/kg (NIVO3 + IPI1) improves the safety profile of the combination; efficacy with the 2 regimens was similar in descriptive analyses. Here we present 3-y safety/efficacy results. Methods: Patients (pts) ≥ 18 y of age with previously untreated unresectable stage III/IV melanoma were randomized 1:1 to receive NIVO3 + IPI1 Q3W × 4 (N = 180) or NIVO1 + IPI3 Q3W × 4 (N = 178), both followed by NIVO 480 mg Q4W until progression/unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was the incidence of grade (gr) 3–5 tx-related adverse events (TRAEs); secondary endpoints (descriptive analyses) included objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). The study was not powered to formally demonstrate noninferiority for efficacy endpoints. Results: At a median follow-up of 44.4 and 43.9 mo in the NIVO3 + IPI1 and NIVO1 + IPI3 groups, respectively, TRAEs led to tx discontinuation in 26% and 39% of pts; 57% and 42% of pts had received maintenance therapy. Gr 3–5 TRAE incidence remained significantly lower with NIVO3 + IPI1 than NIVO1 + IPI3 (33.9% vs 48.3%; odds ratio 0.55 [95% CI 0.36–0.84]). The most frequent TRAEs (any gr) were diarrhea (27%), fatigue (26%), and pruritus (26%) with NIVO3 + IPI1 and diarrhea (31%), pruritus (29%), and rash (27%) with NIVO1 + IPI3. In descriptive analyses, efficacy results were similar to those observed at 1 y. OS and tx-free–analysis outcomes were numerically similar in the 2 groups (table). Conclusions: At 3-y follow-up, NIVO3 + IPI1 continued to demonstrate an improved safety profile compared with NIVO1 + IPI3. In descriptive analyses, both groups demonstrated high 3-y OS rates that were numerically similar. This study provides important information regarding the benefit–risk profile of both dosing regimens of NIVO + IPI in pts with adv melanoma. Clinical trial information: NCT02714218



Secondary endpoints
NIVO3 + IPI1
(N = 180)
NIVO1 + IPI3
(N = 178)
Stratified HRa (95% CI)
Investigator-assessed ORR, % (95% CI)
47 (40–55)
53 (45–60)
0.80b (0.53–1.21)
mPFS, mo (95% CI)
10.2 (6.2–21.9)
10.0 (6.3–40.9)
1.13 (0.85–1.50)
36-mo PFS rate, % (95% CI)
38 (30–46)
43 (35–50)

mOS, mo (95% CI)
NR (43.7–NR)
NR (40.8–NR)
1.03 (0.75–1.41)
36-mo OS rate, % (95% CI)
59 (51–66)
61 (53–67)

mTFI,c,d mo (range)
21.1 (0.2–48.9)e
22.6 (0.1–50.6)f

Pts alive and tx-free,d,g n (%)
72 (74)
72 (77)

aNIVO3 + IPI1 vs NIVO1 + IPI3. bOdds ratio. cTime from end of tx until subsequent cancer tx or last known date alive (if no subsequent cancer tx was received). dPost hoc analysis. en = 132. fn = 127. gPts free of study tx and subsequent systemic tx among those alive and in follow-up at database lock (n = 97 and 94). m, median; NR, not reached; TFI, tx-free interval.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2021 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Discussion Session

Session Title

Melanoma/Skin Cancers

Track

Melanoma/Skin Cancers

Sub Track

Advanced/Metastatic Disease

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT02714218

Citation

J Clin Oncol 39, 2021 (suppl 15; abstr 9516)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2021.39.15_suppl.9516

Abstract #

9516

Abstract Disclosures

Similar Abstracts

First Author: F. Stephen Hodi

Abstract

2021 ASCO Annual Meeting

CheckMate 067: 6.5-year outcomes in patients (pts) with advanced melanoma.

First Author: Jedd D. Wolchok