CheckMate 067: 6.5-year outcomes in patients (pts) with advanced melanoma.

Authors

Jedd Wolchok

Jedd D. Wolchok

Medical Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY

Jedd D. Wolchok , Vanna Chiarion-Sileni , Rene Gonzalez , Jean-Jacques Grob , Piotr Rutkowski , Christopher D. Lao , Charles Lance Cowey , Dirk Schadendorf , John Wagstaff , Reinhard Dummer , Pier Francesco Ferrucci , Michael Smylie , Marcus O. Butler , Andrew Graham Hill , Ivan Marquez-Rodas , John B. A. G. Haanen , Tuba Bas , Wim van Dijck , James Larkin , F. Stephen Hodi

Organizations

Medical Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, Oncology Institute of Veneto IRCCS, Padua, Italy, University of Colorado Cancer Center, Denver, CO, Aix-Marseille University, APHM, Hôpital Timone, Marseille, France, Maria Sklodowska-Curie Institute-Oncology Center, Warsaw, Poland, Michigan Medicine, Rogel Cancer Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, Texas Oncology-Baylor Charles A. Sammons Cancer Center, Dallas, TX, Department of Dermatology, University of Essen, Essen, and German Cancer Consortium, Heidelberg, Germany, The College of Medicine, Swansea University, Swansea, United Kingdom, Skin Cancer Center, University Hospital of Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland, European Institute of Oncology–IRCCS, Milan, Italy, Cross Cancer Institute, Edmonton, AB, Canada, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada, Tasman Oncology Research, Southport, QLD, Australia, Medical Oncology, General University Hospital Gregorio Marañón & CIBERONC, Madrid, Spain, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands, Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ, The Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA

Research Funding

Pharmaceutical/Biotech Company
Bristol Myers Squibb

Background: In the phase 3 CheckMate 067 trial, a durable and sustained clinical benefit was achieved with nivolumab (NIVO) + ipilimumab (IPI) and NIVO alone vs IPI at 5-y of follow-up (overall survival [OS] and progression-free survival [PFS] rates: 52%, 44%, 26% and 36%, 29%, 8%, respectively). Here we report 6.5-y efficacy and safety outcomes. Methods: Eligible pts with previously untreated unresectable stage III or IV melanoma were randomly assigned in a 1:1:1 ratio and stratified by PD-L1 status, BRAF mutation status, and metastasis stage. Pts received NIVO 1 mg/kg + IPI 3 mg/kg for 4 doses Q3W followed by NIVO 3 mg/kg Q2W (n = 314), NIVO 3 mg/kg Q2W + placebo (n = 316), or IPI 3 mg/kg Q3W for 4 doses + placebo (n = 315) until progression or unacceptable toxicity. Co-primary endpoints were PFS and OS with NIVO + IPI or NIVO vs IPI. Secondary endpoints included objective response rate (ORR), descriptive efficacy assessments of NIVO + IPI vs NIVO alone, and safety. Results: With a minimum follow-up of 6.5 y, median OS was 72.1 mo with NIVO + IPI, 36.9 mo with NIVO, and 19.9 mo with IPI (table). Median time from randomization to subsequent systemic therapy was not reached (NR; 95% CI, 59.6–NR) with NIVO + IPI, 25.2 mo (95% CI, 16.0–43.2) with NIVO, and 8.0 mo (95% CI, 6.5–8.7) with IPI; 36%, 49%, and 66% of pts, respectively, received any subsequent systemic therapy. Median treatment-free interval (which excluded pts who discontinued follow-up prior to initiation of subsequent systemic therapy) was 27.6 mo (range, 0–83.0), 2.3 mo (range, 0.2–81.6), and 1.9 mo (range, 0.1–81.9) with NIVO + IPI, NIVO, and IPI, respectively. Of the pts alive and in follow-up, 112/138 (81%; NIVO + IPI), 84/114 (74%; NIVO), and 27/63 (43%; IPI) were off treatment and never received subsequent systemic therapy; 7, 8, and 0 pts, respectively, were still on treatment. Grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse events were reported in 59% of NIVO + IPI-treated pts, 24% of NIVO-treated pts, and 28% of IPI-treated pts. Since the 5-y analysis, no new safety signals were observed and no additional treatment-related deaths occurred. Conclusions: This 6.5-y analysis represents the longest follow-up from a phase 3 melanoma trial in the modern checkpoint inhibitor combination therapy and targeted therapy era. The results show durable improved outcomes with NIVO + IPI and NIVO vs IPI in pts with advanced melanoma. We observed improvement in OS, PFS, and ORR with NIVO + IPI over NIVO alone. Clinical trial information: NCT01844505


NIVO + IPI
(N = 314)
NIVO
(N = 316)
IPI
(N = 315)
Median OS: all pts, mo (95% CI)
72.1
(38.2–NR)
36.9
(28.2–NR)
19.9
(16.8–24.6)
6.5-y OS rate: all pts, % (95% CI)
49
(44–55)
42
(37–42)
23
(19–28)
BRAF mutant
57
(47–66)
43
(33–53)
25
(17–34)
Median PFS: all pts, mo (95% CI)
11.5
(8.7–19.3)
6.9
(5.1–10.2)
2.9
(2.8–3.2)
6.5-y PFS rate: all pts, % (95% CI)
34
(29–40)
29
(23–34)
7
(4–11)
Investigator-assessed ORR, % (95% CI)
58.3
(52.6–63.8)
44.9
(39.4–50.6)
19.0
(14.9–23.8)
Duration of response, mo (95% CI)
NR
(61.9–NR)
NR
(45.7–NR)
19.3
(8.8–47.4)

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2021 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Oral Abstract Session

Session Title

Melanoma/Skin Cancers

Track

Melanoma/Skin Cancers

Sub Track

Local-Regional Disease

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT01844505

Citation

J Clin Oncol 39, 2021 (suppl 15; abstr 9506)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2021.39.15_suppl.9506

Abstract #

9506

Abstract Disclosures