Rosemere Cancer Center, Manchester, United Kingdom
Martin S. Hogg , Tweisge Mugisa , Smriti Gaur
Background: Recently CD4/6 inhibitors have radically changed treatment pathways, leading to a deferment of chemotherapy for advanced disease. Patients still relapse following this treatment; we wish to share our experience of chemotherapy both before and after this change and explore whether there is a change in efficacy. In England CD4/6 inhibitors are prescribed according to the guidelines set out by NHS England (NICE), and are generally utilised in the first line setting unless there is visceral crisis. Methods: This is a retrospective double cohort observational single centre study comparing the efficacy of a chemotherapy regimen (vinorelbine and capecitabine vin cap) before and after the incorporation of CD4/6 inhibitors into breast cancer treatment (Jan 2017- Nov 20). The doublet chemotherapy is widely used at our centre providing a well tolerated and effective alternative to intravenous treatments such as taxanes or single agent capecitabine. Data was collected contemporaneously using e prescribing software and audited retrospectively Results: In the audit period n=19 treated with cap, n= 97 with vin cap, n= 24 treated with CD4/6, (of whom 5 relapsed). 5 patients received abemaciclib first line, as initial therapy, all G3, stage 11A or above, median number of cycles 4.2, I received ribociclib, G2, stage 111A, 7 cycles and 17 received palbociclib, 10 first line, 4 following 1 course chemo, 2 after 2 courses and 1 and after 3 courses, 30% G3 and 70% G2, mean number of cycles 11.06. Patients who received first line cap progressed after a median of 3.5 cycles, with a range of 0-22 months (RR= 47%), for cape vin a median of 8.6, a range of 0-60 months (RR=77%), post CD4/6 mean of 8, median of 9, a range of 0-17 (RR=80%). Conclusions: Those post CD4/6 requiring chemo relapsed far short of the median TTP of around 26months and may have specific characteristics predicting poor response to CD4/6. Despite small numbers salvage chemotherapy remains effective with similar responses. First line vin cap is more efficacious and better tolerated than Cap.
Patient characteristics | Description | Capecitabine only - 2nd line (%) | Capecitabine and vinorelbine (no CD 4/6) (%) | Capecitabine and vinorelbine after CD4/6 (%) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Number | 19 | 97 | 5 | ||||
Age range (yrs) | 31-76 | 30-81 | 53-77 | ||||
Stage | I | 7 | 37% | 9 | 9% | 0 | 0 |
II | 4 | 21% | 43 | 44% | 0 | 0 | |
III | 5 | 26% | 19 | 20% | 2 | 40% | |
IV | 1 | 5% | 22 | 23% | 1 | 1% | |
unknown | 2 | 11% | 4 | 4% | 2 | 40% | |
Stable disease and partial response | Benefit | 47% | 64 | 66% | 4 | 80% | |
Treatment duration (number of cycles) (greater than 12 cycles N) | Median/mean | 3.5/4(n=3) | 06/08 (n=23) | 1 | |||
Time (months) to progression (with range) | Median | 4(0-22) | 8(0-60) | 9(3-15) | |||
Toxicities | Neutopenic sepsis / Grade 3 or 4 Neutropenia | 1 | 5% | 10 | 10% | 1 | 20% |
Grade 3 or 4 diarrhoea | 2 | 11% | 1 | 0.01% | 1 | 20% | |
Grade 3 or 4 nausea and vomiting | 1 | 5% | 1 | 0.01% | 1 | 20% | |
Grade 3 OR 4 Skin | 1 | 5% | 4 | 4.10% | 0 |
Disclaimer
This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org
Abstract Disclosures
2024 ASCO Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium
First Author: Kohei Shitara
2024 ASCO Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium
First Author: Zev A. Wainberg
2024 ASCO Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium
First Author: Hendrik-Tobias Arkenau
First Author: Diana Lüftner