Atezolizumab (atezo) monotherapy versus chemotherapy in previously untreated locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC): Clinical outcomes by PD-L1 status in cisplatin (cis)-ineligible pts from the phase III IMvigor130 study.

Authors

null

Matt D. Galsky

Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai/Tisch Cancer Institute, New York, NY

Matt D. Galsky , Aristotelis Bamias , Jose Angel Arranz Arija , Ian D. Davis , Maria De Santis , Eiji Kikuchi , Xavier Garcia del Muro , Se Hoon Park , Ugo De Giorgi , Boris Alekseev , Marina Mencinger , Kouji Izumi , Javier Puente , Jian-Ri Li , Almut Mecke , Sanjeev Mariathasan , Romain Banchereau , Xinhui Huang , Chooi Peng Lee , Enrique Grande

Organizations

Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai/Tisch Cancer Institute, New York, NY, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece, Gregorio Marañón Hospital, Madrid, Spain, Eastern Health Clinical School, Monash University, Box Hill, VIC, Australia, Department of Urology, Charité University Hospital, Berlin, Germany and Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, Kawasaki, Japan, Catalan Institute of Oncology, IDIBELL, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea, Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori (IRST), IRCCS, Meldola, Italy, Research Oncology Institute, Tomsk, Russian Federation, Institute of Oncology Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia, Kanazawa University Hospital, Kanazawa, Japan, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital Clínico San Carlos (IdISSC), CIBERONC, Madrid, Spain, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan, F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd., Basel, Switzerland, Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, CA, Roche Products Limited, Welwyn Garden City, United Kingdom, MD Anderson Cancer Center Madrid, Madrid, Spain

Research Funding

Pharmaceutical/Biotech Company

Background: Atezo (anti–PD-L1) monotherapy is approved for cis-ineligible pts who have locally advanced or mUC with PD-L1–expressing immune cells on ≥ 5% of the tumor area (IC2/3 per VENTANA SP142 IHC assay). The IMvigor130 primary analysis demonstrated a significant PFS benefit with atezo + platinum/gemcitabine (plt/gem) (arm A) vs placebo (pbo) + plt/gem (arm C) as 1L treatment for mUC (Galsky Lancet 2020); at that time, interim OS data for arm A vs C were encouraging but immature. OS with atezo monotherapy (arm B) could not be formally tested, but favorable efficacy was seen in IC2/3 pts. In this exploratory analysis, we assess outcomes by PD-L1 status in cis-ineligible pts. Methods: Pts were randomized 1:1:1 to arms A, B or C (Galsky Lancet 2020). Evaluation of OS (co-primary EP) was performed via a hierarchical fixed sequence procedure: arm A vs C ITT pts; then, arm B vs C ITT and IC2/3 pts. No formal testing was performed in this exploratory subgroup analyses; OS and RECIST 1.1 ORR (per investigator [secondary EP]) were descriptively evaluated. Results: Efficacy data suggested OS and ORR benefit in atezo-treated cis-ineligible IC2/3 pts (Table). In the overall safety population, all-grade treatment-related AEs (TRAEs) had occurred in 60% and 96% of arm B and C pts, respectively; grade 3-4 TRAEs occurred in 15% and 81%, respectively. Biomarker data evaluating PD-L1 biology (assessed by SP142) and associated transcriptome analysis in arms B vs C will be presented. Conclusions: This exploratory analysis of IMvigor130 pts with 1L cis–ineligible IC2/3 mUC provides additional evidence for clinical benefit with single-agent atezo, a well-tolerated treatment with a distinct safety profile vs chemo. Analyses with longer OS follow-up are warranted. Clinical trial information: NCT02807636. Research Sponsor: F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd

OS events/pts (arm B)OS events/pts (arm C)OutcomeArm BArm COS HR (95% CI)
ITT191/360198/359mOS (95% CI), mo15.7 (13.1, 17.8)13.1 (11.7, 15.1)1.02 (0.83, 1.24)a
ORR (95% CI), %23 (19, 28)43 (38, 49)
IC2/333/8842/85mOS (95% CI), moNE (17.7, NE)17.8 (10.0, NE)0.68 (0.43, 1.08)a
ORR (95% CI), %39 (28, 50)44 (33, 55)
Cis-ineligibleb IC2/321/5026/43mOS (95% CI), mo18.6 (13.1, NE)10.0 (7.4, 19.1)0.53 (0.30, 0.94)c
ORR (95% CI), %38 (25, 53)33 (19, 49)
Cis-ineligibleb IC0/1d85/14085/140mOS (95% CI), mo11.2 (6.9, 15.0)11.2 (9.9, 15.0)1.11 (0.82, 1.51)c
ORR (95% CI), %e16 (10, 23)42 (34, 51)

mFU, 11.8 mo; data cutoff May 31, 2019. NE, not estimable. a Stratified per randomization stratification factors: PD-L1 status (ITT only), Bajorin risk factor score/liver mets, investigator’s choice of plt (cis or carboplatin); Galsky Lancet 2020. b Per Galsky Lancet Oncol 2011, excluding NYHA classification. c Unstratified. d IC0/1 = PD-L1 IC < 5%. e ORR for cis-ineligible IC0/1 pts based on n = 139 in each arm.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2021 Genitourinary Cancers Symposium

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Poster Session: Urothelial Carcinoma

Track

Urothelial Carcinoma

Sub Track

Therapeutics

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT02807636

Citation

J Clin Oncol 39, 2021 (suppl 6; abstr 434)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2021.39.6_suppl.434

Abstract #

434

Poster Bd #

Online Only

Abstract Disclosures