Management of fibroblast growth factor receptor inhibitor (FGFRi) treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) of interest in patients (Pts) with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC).

Authors

null

Arlene O. Siefker-Radtke

The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX

Arlene O. Siefker-Radtke , Andrea Necchi , Se Hoon Park , Jesús García-Donas , Robert A Huddart , Earle F Burgess , Mark T. Fleming , Arash Rezazadeh , Begona Mellado , Sergei Varlamov , Monika Joshi , Ignacio Duran , Scott T. Tagawa , Yousef Zakharia , Keqin Qi , Manish Monga , Manu Sondhi , Anne OHagan , Yohann Loriot

Organizations

The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy, Division of Hematology-Oncology, Samsung Medical Center, Department of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea, Fundacion Hospital de Madrid, Madrid, Spain, Institute of Cancer Research and Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton, United Kingdom, Levine Cancer Institute, Charlotte, NC, Virginia Oncology Associates, U.S. Oncology Research, Norfolk, VA, Norton Healthcare, Louisville, KY, Hospital Clinic Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain, Altai Regional Cancer Center, Barnaul, Russian Federation, Penn State Cancer Institute, Hershey, PA, Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla, Cantabria, Spain, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, Janssen Research & Development, Titusville, NJ, Janssen Research & Development, Spring House, PA, Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Spring House, PA, Department of Cancer Medicine, Institute Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France

Research Funding

Pharmaceutical/Biotech Company

Background: Erdafitinib (ERDA), a pan-FGFR kinase inhibitor, was US FDA approved for adults with mUC with susceptible FGFR3/2 alterations (FGFRa) who progressed on ≥ 1 line of prior platinum-based chemotherapy based on primary results of the BLC2001 trial (NCT02365597). At final analysis (median 2-y follow-up), ERDA showed median OS of 11.3 mo and a manageable safety profile. Some FGFRi toxicities are distinct from those of other small-molecule TKIs. Proactive AE management can avoid treatment discontinuation, ensuring maximum benefit. We report the frequency and management of TEAEs of interest (central serous retinopathy [CSR], hyperphosphatemia [“on-target” FGFRi class effect], stomatitis, and skin and nail toxicities) for the optimal schedule of ERDA from the final analysis of BLC2001. Methods: The open-label, phase II BLC2001 study enrolled pts with measurable mUC, prespecified FGFRa, and progression during/after ≥ 1 line of prior chemotherapy or ≤ 12 mos of (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy or who were cisplatin ineligible, chemo naive. Optimal dose schedule in the study was 8 mg/d continuous ERDA in 28-d cycles with uptitration to 9 mg/d (ERDA 8 mg/d UpT) if prespecified serum phosphate level was not reached and no significant TEAEs occurred. ERDA 8 mg/d UpT safety results as of Aug 9, 2019 (final analysis) are summarized here. AEs were graded using NCI CTCAE v4.0. Results: Median follow-up for 101 pts treated with ERDA 8 mg/d UpT was 24.0 mos; median treatment duration was 5.4 mos. All pts had ≥ 1 TEAE. Hyperphosphatemia, stomatitis, nail disorders, skin disorders, and CSR TEAEs occurred in 78%, 59%, 59%, 55%, and 27% of pts, respectively (few were grade [gr] 3; none were gr ≥ 4; Table). TEAEs were mostly managed with concomitant treatment and dose modifications. As of data cutoff, hyperphosphatemia had resolved in 74/79 (94%) pts; stomatitis in 44/60 (73%); nail and skin TEAEs in 26/60 (43%) and 25/55 (45%), respectively; and CSR in 17/27 (63%). Most unresolved TEAEs were gr 1–2. No treatment-related deaths occurred. Conclusions: ERDA had measurable benefit in pts with advanced UC with FGFRa. As with other targeted therapies, exposure to ERDA is associated with a pattern of AEs. The most common and FGFRi class effect TEAEs were generally reversible and managed by supportive care and dose modification. Clinical trial information: NCT02365597. Research Sponsor: Janssen Research & Development, LLC

N = 101HyperphosphatemiaStomatitisNailSkinCSR
Overall incidence, n (%)79 (78)60 (59)60 (59)55 (55)27 (27)
Gr 154 (54)21 (21)22 (22)25 (25)12 (12)
Gr 223 (23)25 (25)23 (23)22 (22)11 (11)
Gr 32 (2)14 (14)15 (15)8 (8)4 (4)
Median time to onset, d2032694253
Led to dose reductiona, n (%)11 (11)19 (19)20 (20)11 (11)13 (13)
Led to dose interruptiona, n (%)24 (24)27 (27)17 (17)13 (13)8 (8)
Treatment discontinued, n (%)1 (1)2 (2)1 (1)3 (3)3 (3)

a TEAEs leading to dose interruption followed by reduction reported as reduction.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2021 Genitourinary Cancers Symposium

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Poster Session: Urothelial Carcinoma

Track

Urothelial Carcinoma

Sub Track

Therapeutics

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT02365597

Citation

J Clin Oncol 39, 2021 (suppl 6; abstr 426)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2021.39.6_suppl.426

Abstract #

426

Poster Bd #

Online Only

Abstract Disclosures