Re-excision rates among older breast cancer patients undergoing breast-conserving surgery (BCS): Impact of the SSO-ASTRO consensus guideline on margins.

Authors

Mariana Chavez-MacGregor

Mariana Chavez-MacGregor

The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX

Mariana Chavez-MacGregor , Xiudong Lei , Nina Tamirisa , Abigail Suzanne Caudle , Sharon H. Giordano

Organizations

The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX

Research Funding

Other
Susan G. Kome, CIPRIT

Background: BCS has been historically associated with a high re-excision rate, driven in part by the need of obtaining negative margins. The SSO-ASTRO consensus guideline on invasive margins, defined a negative margin as no ink on tumor. In this large population-based study of older breast cancer patients undergoing BCS for invasive breast cancer we evaluate the guideline impact on re-excision rates. Methods: Female patients diagnosed with stage I-II breast cancer between 2012-2015 were identified in the SEER-Medicare database. Patients were >66 years and underwent BCS. Patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy were excluded. We defined the following time periods: pre-guideline (January 2012-September 2013); peri-guideline (October 2013-March 2014) and post-guideline (April 2014-December 2016). Re-excision was defined as a resection, BCS or mastectomy identified using ICD-9 or CPT codes between 4 and 90 days after initial BCS. Overall re-excision rates and 95%CI were calculated and groups compared using X2test. Within subgroups we calculated re-excision rates for the pre and post-guideline periods and report the relative percent change. Regression model evaluated the association between time periods and re-excision while adjusting for important covariates, risk ratios (RRs) and 95%CI are presented. Results: 17001 patients were included. 6762 of them had BCS in the pre, 1786 in the peri, and 8453 in the post-guideline periods. Overall 22.6% of the patients had a re-excision. The rate decreased from 24.8% pre-guideline to 20.3% post-guideline (P < 0.001). The relative change in re-excision varied according to region (Midwest 3-7.3%, Northeast -20%, West -16.5% and South -13.5%) Differences in the relative change according to race/ethnicity were also seen (Whites -19.2, Blacks -15.3% and Hispanics -9.9%). In the multivariable model, BCS in the post-guideline period was associated with a decreased risk of re-excision (RR = 0.83; 95%CI 0.79-0.88). Lobular histology was associated with a higher risk of re-excision (RR = 1.31; 95%CI 1.21-1.42); greater surgeon volume was associated with lower risk of re-excision (RR = 0.89; 95%CI 0.82-0.95). Conclusions: There has been a statistically significant decrease in the re-excision rate after BCS associated with the dissemination of the SSO-ASTRO consensus guideline on invasive margins. Our study confirms the impact that guidelines have modifying patterns or practice, reducing the frequency of unnecessary interventions.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2020 ASCO Virtual Scientific Program

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Breast Cancer—Local/Regional/Adjuvant

Track

Breast Cancer

Sub Track

Local-Regional Therapy

Citation

J Clin Oncol 38: 2020 (suppl; abstr 576)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2020.38.15_suppl.576

Abstract #

576

Poster Bd #

68

Abstract Disclosures