Background: LS is caused by a germline mutation in one of several DNA mismatch repair (MMR) genes: MLH1, MSH2, MSH6 or PMS2 (d-MMR). A minority of LS patients have MMR proficient tumors (p-MMR). ICI therapy has dramatically changed outcome of d-MMR (majority of LS patients. However, data about response to ICI in LS patients, irrespective of their tumor MMR status is scarce. The aim of this study was to evaluate outcomes of ICI therapy in all LS associated Cancer. Methods: This was a retrospective analysis of LS associated cancers treated with one of the 6 ICIs at our center. We also looked at age, sex, microsatellite status, response and survival. Results: Out of 262 LS patients analyzed, 194 had cancer and 22 received ICIs. Among the patients analyzed, the mean age at diagnosis of 1^st cancer was 51 yrs. There were 10 females (47%). 10 patients had colorectal (45%), 3 urothelial (14%), 2 renal cell, 2 cholangiocarcinoma and one each of esophageal, ovarian, uterine, glioblastoma multiforme and pancreatic cancer. One patient died from progressive disease after receiving a single dose and was not included in the analysis. 17 patients (80%) received Pembrolizumab, 11 patients were microsatellite unstable (MSI), 3 were microsatellite stable (MSS) while 7 were unknown. 2 patients achieved complete response (CR) (10%), 1 patient had partial response (PR) (5%), 13 had stable disease (62%) while 5 had progressive disease (23%) leading to a disease control rate (DCR) of 76%. Of the 3 known MSS Lynch syndrome patients, 2 did not respond while the 3^rd continues to respond at 9 months of therapy. Of the 5 patients who had PD, 2 were MSS, 2 unknown and 1 MSI. Among the 16 patients who responded, 15 of 16 (94%) had sustained response and have not experienced disease progression or relapse. 3 of these patients have been off therapy (1 due to immune related adverse evet) and have had no relapse. One responder progressed after 18 cycles of therapy. The DCR was 71% at 12 months as well as 48 months of follow up. Median progression survival has not been reached. Similarly, median overall survival has not been reached. Conclusions: Our study is the one of the largest reported analysis of LS associated cancer patients treated with ICIs and included LS patients with both MSI and MSS tumors. Though small, our data suggests robust DCR and prolonged responses in Lynch associated MSS tumors treated with ICI. This encouraging response in MSS tumors along with higher response rates in LS associated cancers as compared to non-LS MSI tumors, suggests that there may be additional drivers of response to ICI in LS patients leading to superior responses.