A prospective analysis of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in gastrointestinal cancers: Results from a tertiary cancer center.

Authors

Akhil Kapoor

Akhil Kapoor

Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India

Akhil Kapoor , Vikas S. Ostwal , Anant Ramaswamy , Prabhat Ghanshyam Bhargava , Sudeep Gupta , Kumar Prabhash

Organizations

Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India, Department of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre (TMC), Mumbai, India

Research Funding

No funding received
None

Background: Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) is a bothersome side-effect associated with cancer chemotherapy which adversely impacts both quality of life and the ability to carry out the activities of daily living. This study was conducted to assess the proportion of patients developing CINV after receiving chemotherapy for gastrointestinal (GI) cancers, in spite of receiving antiemetic prophylaxis as per the standard guidelines. Methods: Consecutive patients with GI malignancy who had not received previous chemotherapy were eligible for enrollment in the study if they were scheduled to receive at least one cycle of chemotherapy. SPSS version 20 was used for all statistical calculations. Results: 701 patients fulfilling the eligibility criteria were included in this study, out of which 55.4% were males, median age was 51 years (range 22-77). Biliary tract cancer (34%) was the most common diagnosis followed by colorectal (30.2%) and gastric cancer (19.6%). As per MASCC guidelines, 22.1% patients received highly emetogenic chemotherapy, 56.0% moderately emetogenic chemotherapy (MEC) while 19.9% received regimen with low emetogenicity. Failure to achieve complete response (CR, absence of acute and delayed CINV) was found in 27.4% patients. On separately analysing MEC group, overall CR was not achieved in 33.8% with failure in acute settings in 17.8% and delayed in 16.0% patients. Only significant factor for not achieving CR was use of oxaliplatin based chemotherapy (p = 0.018 for acute and p = 0.014 for delayed CINV). Conclusions: More than one fourth patients failed to achieve complete response for CINV in gastrointestinal cancers despite using prophylaxis as per standard guidelines. Use of oxaliplatin based therapy is an important factor for MEC causing CINV. There is urgent need to update the guidelines for prophylaxis in this setting.

AcuteDelayed
Nausea
Across All Chemo Groups98 (14.0%)89 (12.7%)
Minimal1 (7.7%)1 (7.7%)
Low11 (7.8%)10 (7.1%)
Moderate68 (17.3%)62 (15.8%)
High18 (11.6%)16 (10.3%)
Vomiting
Across All Chemo Groups49 (7.0%)41 (5.8%)
Minimal0 (0%)0 (0%)
Low3 (2.1%)3 (2.1%)
Moderate41 (10.4%)33 (8.4%)
High5 (3.2%)5 (3.2%)
Complete Response Not Achieved
Across All Chemo Groups101 (14.4%)91 (13.0%)
Minimal1 (7.7%)1 (7.7%)
Low12 (8.6%)11 (7.8%)
Moderate70 (17.8%)63 (16.0%)
High18 (11.6%)16 (10.3%)
Complete Response Not AchievedOverall
Across All Chemo Groups192 (27.4)
Minimal2/13 (15.4%)
Low23/140 (16.4%)
Moderate133/393 (33.8%)
High34/155 (21.9%)

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2020 ASCO Virtual Scientific Program

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Symptoms and Survivorship

Track

Symptom Science and Palliative Care

Sub Track

Palliative Care and Symptom Management

Citation

J Clin Oncol 38: 2020 (suppl; abstr 12111)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2020.38.15_suppl.12111

Abstract #

12111

Poster Bd #

399

Abstract Disclosures

Similar Abstracts

First Author: Rafaela de Brito Alves

Abstract

2020 ASCO Virtual Scientific Program

Antiemetic prophylaxis with NEPA: Final results of the German AKYPRO study.

First Author: Joerg Peter Schilling