Prevalence of antecipatory nausea and vomiting in cancer patients exposed to highly emetogenic chemotherapy.

Authors

null

Rafaela de Brito Alves

Faculdade de Medicina do ABC, Santo André, Brazil

Rafaela de Brito Alves , Camilla Vieira de Reboucas , Louize Caroline Marques Oliveira , Alayne Magalhaes Trindade Domingues Yamada , Felipe Melo Cruz

Organizations

Faculdade de Medicina do ABC, Santo André, Brazil, São Camilo Oncologia, São Paulo, Brazil, Núcleo de Pesquisa e Ensino da Rede São Camilo Oncologia, Sao Paulo, Brazil, Núcleo de Pesquisa e Ensino da Rede São Camilo, Sao Paulo, Brazil

Research Funding

No funding received

Background: Anticipatory nausea (AN) and vomiting are unpleasant symptoms observed in anticipation of chemotherapy regimens. It is best described as a learned response through classical conditioning when one or more distinctive features of the chemotherapy clinic (conditioned stimuli) associated with the administration of emetogenic chemotherapy (unconditioned stimuli) trigger the emetogenic reflex. Little is known about AN's occurrence after the advent of the new neurokinin-1 antagonist. This prospective study evaluated AN's prevalence in ambulatory breast cancer patients receiving high effective antiemetic prophylaxis and evaluated potential predictors of AN. Methods: This prospective observational study was performed at a single Brazilian Institution. Key inclusion criteria were patients aged 18 years or older with breast cancer scheduled to receive anthracycline chemotherapy with an appropriate antiemetic regimen, including a neurokinin-1 receptor antagonist, a serotonin-3 receptor antagonist, and a corticosteroid. Eligible patients used a diary to record nausea, vomiting, and use of rescue medication in the first 2-cycle of treatment through 120 after infusion. AN was assessed before chemotherapy on day 1 of cycle two. We excluded patients with nausea and vomiting presented 24h before cycle one and patients who did not receive standard antiemetic prophylaxis. Results: Between August 04, 2020, and August 12, 2021, 60 patients were screened, and 52 patients were enrolled. The mean age was 50,8 (28 – 69), the majority had stage III (53,8%) and received chemotherapy with curative intent (94%). During cycle 1, the frequency of overall nausea and vomiting was 67.31%, and severe nausea and vomiting (defined as grade > 4 at a 10-point visual scale or use of rescue medication) was 55.77%. Ten patients had AN (19.23%). The occurrence of nausea and vomiting during cycle one was the only statistically significant predictor of AN (OR = 16, 95% CI 2.4, 670.9, p-value = 0.0003). Conclusions: The prevalence of AN is still high in the era of neurokinin-1 antagonists, and failure of antiemetic control on cycle one remains the main risk factor. All efforts should be made to control chemotherapy-induced nausea or nausea and vomiting on cycle one to avoid AN. Clinical trial information: NCT04785495.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2022 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Publication Only

Session Title

Symptoms and Survivorship

Track

Symptom Science and Palliative Care

Sub Track

Palliative Care and Symptom Management

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT04785495

Citation

J Clin Oncol 40, 2022 (suppl 16; abstr e24112)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2022.40.16_suppl.e24112

Abstract #

e24112

Abstract Disclosures

Similar Abstracts

First Author: Garrett Young

First Author: Venkatraman Radhakrishnan

First Author: Venkatraman Radhakrishnan