Controlled IL-12 in combination with a PD-1 inhibitor subjects with recurrent glioblastoma.

Authors

null

E. Antonio Chiocca

Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA

E. Antonio Chiocca , Rimas Vincas Lukas , Clark C Chen , Ganesh Rao , Christina Amidei , Jill Yannetti Buck , Nira Hadar , Nathan A. Demars , John Miao , Taylor Estupinan , John W. Loewy , Yunxia Wang , Arnold Bruce Gelb , Laurence JN Cooper

Organizations

Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Chicago, IL, Department of Neurosurgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, Ziopharm Oncology, Inc, Boston, MA

Research Funding

Pharmaceutical/Biotech Company
Ziopharm Oncology

Background: Monotherapy with intratumoral Ad-RTS-hIL-12 (Ad), a gene therapeutic conditionally expressing IL-12 under the transcriptional control of oral veledimex (“Controlled IL-12”), was shown in a phase 1 study (NCT02026271) to elicit a new and sustained intra-tumoral infiltration of T cells with co-expression of PD-1. We report updated findings following completion of enrollment (with follow-up ongoing) for a phase 1 substudy (NCT03636477) evaluating safety and tolerability of local, Controlled IL-12 in combination with nivolumab (nivo) in adults with recurrent glioblastoma (rGBM). Methods: Multicenter, open label, dose-escalation phase 1 trial to evaluate safety and tolerability of local, Controlled IL-12 with nivo in adult subjects with rGBM. Ad was administered by single intratumoral injection (2 x 1011 viral particles, Day 0 at time of resection) plus V (10 or 20 mg) PO QD x 15 with nivo (1 or 3 mg/kg) IV on Days -7, 15, then Q2W. Results: 21 subjects were treated (Cohort 1: V 10 mg, nivo 1 mg/kg, n = 3; Cohort 2: V 10 mg, nivo 3 mg/kg, n = 3; and Cohort 3: V 20 mg, nivo 3 mg/kg, n = 3 + 12 expansion). Safety data were similar to Ad+V monotherapy. Adverse reactions during follow-on nivo dosing were consistent with anti-PD-1 labeling, manageable, and generally reversible with no synergistic toxicities. Focusing on the 20mg V cohort (recommended phase 2 dose), serum IL-12 mean ± SEM (screening, 0.4 ± 0.1 pg/mL; Day 0, 0.6 ± 0.1 pg/mL), increased after Ad+V to 8.7 ± 3.3 pg/mL on Day 3. Similarly, serum IFN-g levels did not increase due to nivo alone (screening, 0 ± 0 pg/mL; Day 0, 0 ± 0 pg/mL), increasing after Ad+V to 6.2 ± 2.3 pg/mL on Day 7. Additionally, nivo alone did not significantly increase circulating T cells (CD3+ CD8+%) (paired differences comparison, Day 0 to screening) 3.1%, p =0.13, whereas Ad+V significantly increased peripheral T cells (Day 28 - Day 0) 3.6%, p =0.02. Pseudoprogression followed by a decrease in size (SPD) has been shown as evidenced by serial MRIs in a subgroup of subjects. Preliminary overall survival findings will be presented. Conclusions: Controlled IL-12 with PD-1 inhibition is a rational combination with initial data consistent with immune-mediated effects, a favorable safety profile, and early evidence of anti-tumor effects. An additional phase 2 study combining Controlled IL-12 with cemiplimab-rwlc in adults with rGBM is ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT03636477.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2020 ASCO Virtual Scientific Program

Session Type

Poster Discussion Session

Session Title

Central Nervous System Tumors

Track

Central Nervous System Tumors

Sub Track

Central Nervous System Tumors

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT03636477

Citation

J Clin Oncol 38: 2020 (suppl; abstr 2510)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2020.38.15_suppl.2510

Abstract #

2510

Poster Bd #

1

Abstract Disclosures