National Cancer Center/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
Binghe Xu , Min Yan , Fei Ma , Xi-Chun Hu , Ji Feng Feng , Quchang Ouyang , Zhongsheng Tong , Huiping Li , Qingyuan Zhang , Tao Sun , Xian Wang , Yongmei Yin , Ying Cheng , Wei Li , Xiaoyu Zhu , Chunxia Chen , Jianjun Zou
Background: Pyrotinib (an irreversible pan-ErbB inhibitor) plus capecitabine showed clinically meaningful benefits and acceptable tolerability in patients (pts) with HER2+ metastatic breast cancer (MBC) in phase 1 and 2 studies. Methods: This open-label, multicenter, randomized phase 3 study enrolled HER2+ MBC pts after trastuzumab and taxanes, and/or anthracyclines. Up to two prior lines of chemotherapy (chemo) for metastatic disease were allowed. Pts were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive pyrotinib 400 mg or lapatinib 1250 mg qd continuously plus capecitabine 1000 mg/m2 bid on days 1–14 of 21-day cycles. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) per blinded independent central review. Results: From Jul 2017 to Oct 2018, 267 pts were randomized to the pyrotinib (n=134) or lapatinib (n=133) arm. One pt in the lapatinib arm did not receive study treatment and was excluded from analyses. 42.5% and 34.8% of pts in the pyrotinib and lapatinib arm had no prior chemo for metastatic disease, 41.8% and 49.2% had one prior line, and 15.7% and 15.9% had two lines. At the planned interim analysis, the median PFS was 12.5 months (95% CI 9.7–not reached) with pyrotinib plus capecitabine vs 6.8 months (95% CI 5.4–8.1) with lapatinib plus capecitabine (HR 0.39 [95% CI 0.27–0.56]; P<0.0001), which met the criterion for statistical significance (≤0.0066). Among trastuzumab-resistant pts, prolonged PFS with pyrotinib plus capecitabine was also observed (12.5 months [95% CI 6.9 to not reached] vs 6.9 months [95% CI 5.4 to not reached]; HR 0.60 [95% CI 0.29 to 1.21]). Benefits in objective response rate, clinical benefit rate, and duration of response with pyrotinib plus capecitabine were also indicated (Table). The most common grade ≥3 adverse events were diarrhea (30.6% vs 8.3% in the pyrotinib vs lapatinib arm) and hand-foot syndrome (16.4% vs 15.2%). Conclusions: In pts with HER2+ MBC after trastuzumab and chemo, pyrotinib plus capecitabine achieved a significant better PFS than lapatinib plus capecitabine, with manageable toxicity, verifying the phase 2 findings. Clinical trial information: NCT03080805.
Pyrotinib arm (N=134) | Lapatinib arm (N=132) | |
---|---|---|
Objective response rate, % (95% CI) | 67.2 (58.5–75.0) | 51.5 (42.7–60.3) |
Difference, % (95% CI); P | 15.6 (4.0–27.3); P=0.0091 | |
Clinical benefit rate, % (95% CI) | 73.1 (64.8–80.4) | 59.1 (50.2–67.6) |
Difference, % (95% CI); P | 14.0 (2.8–25.3); P=0.0155 | |
Duration of response (mo), median (95% CI) | 11.1 (9.7–not reached) | 7.0 (5.6–9.8) |
Response ongoing, n (%) | 63 (70.0) | 33 (48.5) |
Disclaimer
This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org
Abstract Disclosures
2020 ASCO Virtual Scientific Program
First Author: Santiago Escrivá
First Author: Nicholas Patrick McAndrew
2022 ASCO Annual Meeting
First Author: Izzet Dogan
2019 ASCO Annual Meeting
First Author: Hope S. Rugo