SOPHIA analysis by chemotherapy (Ctx) choice: A phase III (P3) study of margetuximab (M) + Ctx versus trastuzumab (T) + Ctx in patients (pts) with pretreated HER2+ metastatic (met) breast cancer (MBC).

Authors

null

Santiago Escrivá

Medical Oncology Department, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital. Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona, Spain

Santiago Escrivá , Seock-Ah Im , Fatima Cardoso , Javier Cortes , Giuseppe Curigliano , William John Gradishar , Mark D. Pegram , Gail Lynn Shaw Wright , Christelle Levy , Michelino De Laurentiis , Jean-Marc Ferrero , Shakeela Wazeen Bahadur , Sung-Bae Kim , Katarína Petráková , David A. Riseberg , Denise A. Yardley , Sutton Edlich , Sam Hong , Edwin P. Rock , Hope S. Rugo

Organizations

Medical Oncology Department, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital. Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona, Spain, Seoul National University Hospital, Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea, Champalimaud Clinical Center/Champalimaud Foundation, Breast Unit, Lisbon, Portugal, Vall d’Hebron Institute of Oncology, Barcelona, Spain, Division of Early Drug Development for Innovative Therapies, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy, Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, Stanford School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, Florida Cancer Specialists and Research Institute, New Port Richey, FL, Centre François Baclesse, Department of Medical Oncology, Caen, France, National Cancer Institute “Fondazione Pascale,” Department of Breast and Thoracic Oncology, Naples, Italy, Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France, Bannerer MD Anderson Cancer Center, Breast Cancer Program, Gilbert, AZ, Department of Oncology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea, Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, Department of Comprehensive Cancer Care, Brno, Czech Republic, Mercy Medical Center, Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Baltimore, MD, Sarah Cannon Research Institute and Tennessee Oncology PLLC, Nashville, TN, MacroGenics, Inc., Rockville, MD, University of California San Francisco Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA

Research Funding

Pharmaceutical/Biotech Company
MacroGenics

Background: Despite advances, pretreated HER2+ MBC remains incurable with ongoing need for new therapies. Investigational M has similar HER2 binding and antiproliferative effects as T. Relative to T, M Fc engineering increases binding affinity for both variants of activating Fc receptor (FcR) CD16A and decreases affinity for inhibitory FcR CD32B, coordinately activating innate and adaptive immunity. In a Phase 3 (P3) trial, M prolonged PFS over T (Table). Second interim OS results from Sept 2019 also favor M (hazard ratio [HR], 0.89; 95% CI 0.69–1.13; nominal P=0.326). Methods: SOPHIA (NCT02492711), an open-label P3 trial, enrolled pts with HER2+ MBC after pertuzumab and 1–3 lines of prior treatment (Tx) for MBC. Randomization was 1:1 to M (15 mg/kg IV q3w + Ctx) or T (6 [8 for loading dose] mg/kg IV q3w + Ctx), stratified by met sites (≤2, >2), lines of Tx for met disease (≤2, >2), and Ctx choice, including capecitabine (Cap), eribulin (Eri), gemcitabine (Gem), or vinorelbine (Vin). Primary endpoints were central blinded PFS and OS, assessed sequentially using the stratified log-rank test. Results: Investigator chemotherapy choices and results by chemotherapy are shown in the table. Subjects receiving Eri and Gem had the lowest PFS hazards ratios (HRs), favoring M over T, although no statistical significance of individual chemotherapy subgroups was seen. There was variable toxicity among Ctx subgroups, and fewer subjects receiving Cap had Ctx related Grade 3 or higher (>=Gr 3) AEs. In this unblinded study, more subjects on M than T in all subgroups discontinued Ctx while continuing study antibody. Conclusions: In combination with chemotherapy in pretreated HER2+ MBC, M improved PFS over T. Safety was manageable in all Ctx subgroups. Differences among HRs for chemotherapy subgroups may be driven by selection bias and/or sensitivity differences. Clinical trial information: NCT02492711.

SOPHIA results by chemotherapy.

PFS, 265 events
HR (95% CI)*
>= Gr 3 Ctx Related AEs**AEs leading to Ctx Discontinuation**
Intent-To-Treat (N=536)0.76 (0.59-0.98)41.7% M vs 40.6% T11% M vs 6.4% T
Capecitabine (n=143)0.77 (0.47-1.26)25% M vs 28% T11.8% M vs 8.5% T
Eribulin (n=136)0.66 (0.42-1.05)45.5% M vs 48.5% T13.6% M vs 5.9% T
Gemcitabine (n=66)0.58 (0.29-1.18)40% M vs 53.1% T17.1% M vs 15.6% T
Vinorelbine (n=191)0.90 (0.60-1.35)51.6% M vs 40% T6.3% M vs 2.1% T

* Primary PFS data cutoff 10 October 2018: 536 Intent-To-Treat subjects ** Safety data cutoff 10 April 2019: 530 subjects receiving any study therapy

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2020 ASCO Virtual Scientific Program

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Breast Cancer—Metastatic

Track

Breast Cancer

Sub Track

HER2-Positive

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT02492711

Citation

J Clin Oncol 38: 2020 (suppl; abstr 1040)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2020.38.15_suppl.1040

Abstract #

1040

Poster Bd #

125

Abstract Disclosures