Smoking cessation (SC) and lung cancer (LC) outcomes: A survival benefit for recent-quitters? A pooled analysis of 34,649 International Lung Cancer Consortium (ILCCO) patients.

Authors

Aline Fusco Fares

Aline Fusco Fares

Princess Margaret Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada

Aline Fusco Fares , Mei Jiang , Ping Yang , David C. Christiani , Chu Chen , Paul Brennan , Jie Zhang , Ann G. Schwartz , Maria Teresa Landi , Kouya Shiraishi , Brid M Ryan , Hongbing Shen , Matthew B. Schabath , Garcia Adonina , Sanjay Shete , Loic Le Marchand , Angela Cox , Rayjean Hung , Wei Xu , Geoffrey Liu

Organizations

Princess Margaret Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, Toronto, ON, Canada, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, IARC, Lyon, France, Shanghai Cancer Hospital, Shanghai, China, Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI, NIH, Bethesda, MD, Division of Genome Biology, National Cancer Center Research Institute, Tokyo, Japan, Nanjing Cancer Center, Nanjing, China, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, IUOPA, Oviedo, Spain, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, University of Hawaii Cancer Centre, Honolulu, HI, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom, Mount Sinai Health, Toronto, ON, Canada, Department of Biostatistics, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada

Research Funding

Other Foundation
ILCCO studies: including multiple supporters (Alan Brown Chair in Molecular Genomics, NCI grants, the Intramural Research Program of the Center for Cancer Research, Mayo Foundation, etc)

Background: Tobacco smoking profoundly impacts LC risk; however, data are limited as to what extent SC prior to diagnosis impacts LC overall survival (OS) and lung cancer specific survival (LCSS). LC screening offers a possible teachable moment, but there is uncertainty of SC benefits after a lifetime of smoking. We use the ILCCO database to answer if SC prior to LC dx is associated with better OS and LCSS, considering time since smoking cessation (TSSC). Methods: Using individual data, analysis was performed on 17 ILCCO studies with available TSSC to estimate survival using univariable analysis and models of stage-adjusted and cumulative smoking-adjusted multivariable analysis. Adjusted Hazard Ratios (aHR) from Cox models, cubic spline smooth curves and Kaplan-Meier curves were created. Sensitivity analysis was performed for TSSC and LCSS on 13 studies. Results: Of 34649 patients, 14322 (41%) were current smokers 14273 (41%) ex-smokers and 6054 (18%) never smokers at diagnosis. We confirmed that ex-smokers (aHR 0.88 CI 0.86-0.91) and never smokers (aHR 0.76 CI 0.73-0.8) improved OS compared to current smokers. Amongst ex-smokers, < 2y TSSC (aHR 0.88 CI 0.82-0.94), 2-5y TSSC (aHR 0.83 CI 0.77-0.90) and > 5y TSSC (aHR 0.8 CI 0.76-0.84) had improved OS compared to CS. Sensitivity analysis showed a trend towards improved LCSS survival for < 2y TSSC (aHR 0.95 CI 0.86-1.05) and 2-5y TSSC (aHR 0.93 CI 0.83-1.04), whereas > 5y TSSC significantly improved LCSS by 15% (aHR 0.85 CI 0.78-0.92). To mimic the LC screening participants, in analysis of > 30 pack-years individuals, associations were strikingly strong: < 2y TSSC had improved OS by 14% (aHR 0.86 CI 0.80-0.93); 2-5y TSSC by 17% (aHR 0.83 CI 0.76-0.90); and > 5 TSSC by 22% (aHR 0.78 CI 0.74-0.83), compared to current smokers; for < 30 packs-years, a trend towards better OS was observed for < 2y TSSC (aHR 0.95 CI 0.92-1.02) and 2-5y TSSC (aHR 0.86 CI 0.74-1.01), whereas > 5y TSSC improved OS by 23% (aHR 0.77 CI 0.72-0.82). Conclusions: Among ex-smokers, the risk of overall death was reduced by 12% on < 2y TSSC, 17% on 2-5y TSSC and 20% > 5y TSSC, whereas for LCSS, the benefit was significant only for > 5y TSCC, compared to current smokers at time of diagnosis. Here we demonstrate that convincing screening participants to quit smoking at any point of their trajectory, even just prior to dx such as < 2y TSSC, improved OS, and LCSS benefit was present beyond 5y of quitting. These relationships are independent of pack-years, age, across all stages and other prognostic variables.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2020 ASCO Virtual Scientific Program

Session Type

Poster Discussion Session

Session Title

Cancer Prevention, Risk Reduction, and Genetics

Track

Prevention, Risk Reduction, and Genetics

Sub Track

Etiology/Epidemiology

Citation

J Clin Oncol 38: 2020 (suppl; abstr 1512)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2020.38.15_suppl.1512

Abstract #

1512

Poster Bd #

4

Abstract Disclosures

Similar Abstracts

Abstract

2023 ASCO Annual Meeting

Rates of colorectal cancer screening versus lung cancer screening: Where does the problem lie?

First Author: Sasmith R. Menakuru

First Author: Sasmith R. Menakuru

First Author: Jennifer Bail

Abstract

2023 ASCO Quality Care Symposium

Lung cancer screening in the prison population.

First Author: Lakshmi Kolandra