Patient perception and adherence to lung cancer screening in those who meet eligibility criteria.

Authors

null

Sasmith R. Menakuru

Indiana University School of Medicine, Muncie, IN

Sasmith R. Menakuru , Vijaypal S. Dhillon , Amir F. Beirat , Nasser H. Hanna

Organizations

Indiana University School of Medicine, Muncie, IN, Department of Hematology/Oncology, IU Simon Comprehensive Cancer, Indianapolis, IN

Research Funding

No funding received
None.

Background: The US Preventive Services Task Force reported 14.2 million Americans qualify for lung cancer screening. As per the Lung Cancer Screening Trial, using low dose computed tomography (LDCT) for screening demonstrated a 20% reduction in lung cancer-related deaths. Despite that, the 2022 State of Lung Cancer Report from the American Lung Association indicates that only 5.8% of eligible patients in the U.S. undergo lung cancer screening. Indiana, where this study was conducted, is ranked 46/50 and 44/50 in the number of smokers and incidence of lung cancer, respectively. A statewide lung cancer screening effort is greatly needed. Methods: The study population was recruited between 10/2022 and 1/2023 from 2 hospitals within the Indiana University Health network. Patients were surveyed during their primary care clinic visits. Eligibility criteria included a 20-pack-year or more history of smoking, an age between 50 and 80, and were either current smokers or quit within the last 15 years. A survey was designed with open-ended questions and was standardized to all participants. The questions covered the cohort's familiarity with lung cancer screening, the associated risk with smoking, and the potential hindrances to getting screened. After discussing the benefits and risks of the screening, the patients were then asked if they would consider getting an initial LDCT. Patients' compliance with their scheduled LDCT date was recorded. Results: 175 persons met eligibility criteria, and all reported understanding the link between smoking and lung cancer; however, 147 (84%) were unfamiliar with the need for screening. The barriers to screening, as described by the cohort, included fear of cancer diagnosis (33.7%), lack of symptoms (22.2%), the stigma associated with being a smoker (12.6%), doubting the usefulness of screening (12.0%), not wanting to quit smoking (6.9%), cost of LDCT in those under 65 (4.6%), fear of exposure to radiation (4.0%), believing that cancer treatment would be worse than continuing to smoke (2.3%), and mistrust of the medical system (1.7%). When the patients were educated on LDCT’s benefits and risks, 118 patients (67.4%) perceived it as beneficial and elected to get it scheduled. Of the 118 patients, 64 (54.2%) attended their scheduled initial LDCT. Conclusions: The patient’s perceptions of screening varied, and from our data, it appears that most smokers were unaware of the need for a LDCT and had multiple concerns. Once the patients were educated about the benefits and risks of lung cancer screening, most scheduled an initial LDCT and perceived it to be beneficial.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2023 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Publication Only

Session Title

Publication Only: Prevention, Risk Reduction, and Hereditary Cancer

Track

Prevention, Risk Reduction, and Genetics

Sub Track

Cancer Prevention

Citation

J Clin Oncol 41, 2023 (suppl 16; abstr e22503)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2023.41.16_suppl.e22503

Abstract #

e22503

Abstract Disclosures

Similar Abstracts

Abstract

2023 ASCO Annual Meeting

Rates of colorectal cancer screening versus lung cancer screening: Where does the problem lie?

First Author: Sasmith R. Menakuru

Abstract

2023 ASCO Annual Meeting

Navigation program for LDCT lung cancer screening implementation: A quality initiative.

First Author: Jasmine Shrestha

Abstract

2023 ASCO Quality Care Symposium

Lung cancer screening in the prison population.

First Author: Lakshmi Kolandra