Evaluation of minimal residual disease in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma patients treated with venetoclax or placebo in combination with bortezomib and dexamethasone: BELLINI study analyses.

Authors

null

Philippe Moreau

Hematology Department, CHU Nantes, Nantes, France

Philippe Moreau , Simon J. Harrison , Michele Cavo , Javier de La Rubia , Rakesh Popat , Vania Hungria , Hans Salwender , Kenshi Suzuki , Inho Kim , Andrew Spencer , Michael O'Dwyer , Wan-Jen Hong , Muhammad Jalaluddin , Xiaoqing Yang , James Michael Pauff , Paulo Cesar Maciag , Jeremy A. Ross , Shaji Kumar

Organizations

Hematology Department, CHU Nantes, Nantes, France, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre and Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Australia, GIMEMA, European Myeloma Network, Italy, Hospital Universitario La Fé, València, Spain, Department of Haematology, University College London Hospitals, London, United Kingdom, Santa Casa Medical School, São Paulo, Brazil, Asklepios Tumorzentrum Hamburg, AK Altona and AK St Georg, Hamburg, Germany, Japanese Red Cross Medical Center, Department of Hematology, Tokyo, Japan, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, South Korea, Alfred Health-Monash University, Melbourne, Australia, The National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland, Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, CA, NOVARTIS, Boston, MA, AbbVie, Inc, North Chicago, IL, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN

Research Funding

Pharmaceutical/Biotech Company
AbbVie and Genentech

Background: Venetoclax (Ven) is a selective, potent BCL-2 inhibitor that has synergistic activity with bortezomib (B) and dexamethasone (d). In the Phase 3 BELLINI trial, addition of Ven to Bd significantly improved median progression-free survival (PFS) and response rates, including minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity, but resulted in increased mortality vs placebo (Pbo). Here, we determine whether MRD negativity was associated with longer PFS and OS in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) patients treated with Ven+Bd in the BELLINI dataset. Methods: In BELLINI (NCT02755597), RRMM patients (pts) sensitive or naïve to proteasome inhibitors with 1-3 prior lines of therapy were randomized 2:1 to Ven (800 mg) or Pbo plus B (1.3 mg/m2) and d (20 mg). Next-gen sequencing MRD assessments were done on bone marrow aspirates at the time of suspected CR/sCR, and 6- and 12-months post confirmation of CR/sCR. Patients with a missing or indeterminate assessment were considered MRD positive. Evaluation of MRD in biomarker-defined subgroups (cytogenetics and BCL2 expression) was also performed and will be presented. Results: In total, 291 pts were randomized; 194 to Ven, 97 to Pbo. As of 13 Sep 2019, the median follow-up was 29 months. Ven + Bd demonstrated significantly higher MRD negativity rates ( < 10−5), including a higher proportion of pts achieving sustained MRD negativity (Table). In the Ven arm, the median (m)PFS was not reached for MRD negative pts vs 16.2 months for MRD positive pts (HR = 0.23, 95% CI: 0.10-0.54, p < 0.001). While the mOS was not reached in the Ven arm, OS was significantly longer for MRD negative vs MRD positive pts (HR = 0.25, 95% CI: 0.08-0.80, p = 0.0194). Conclusions: The addition of Ven to Bd resulted in deep and durable responses, including higher rates of MRD negativity. MRD negativity in the context of Ven was associated with prolonged survival in patients with RRMM, consistent with the broader MRD body of evidence with other therapies in MM. Clinical trial information: NCT02755597.

MRD negativity rates in the ITT population.

MRD negativity status ( < 10−5), % (n/N)Ven + BdPbo + Bdp-value
MRD negativity rate15%
(29/194)
2%
(2/97)
p = 0.0016
MRD negative ≥CR rate13%
(26/194)
1%
(1/97)
p = 0.0013
MRD negativity rate in pts achieving ≥CR46%
(26/57)
14%
(1/7)
p = 0.2386
≥6-month sustained MRD negativity rate in pts achieving ≥CR16%
(9/57)
0%
(0/7)
p = 0.5768
≥12-month sustained MRD negativity rate in pts achieving ≥CR7%
(4/57)
0%
(0/7)
p = 1.0000

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2020 ASCO Virtual Scientific Program

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Hematologic Malignancies—Plasma Cell Dyscrasia

Track

Hematologic Malignancies

Sub Track

Plasma Cell Disorders

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT02755597

Citation

J Clin Oncol 38: 2020 (suppl; abstr 8547)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2020.38.15_suppl.8547

Abstract #

8547

Poster Bd #

447

Abstract Disclosures