ECOG-ACRIN EAA172: Phase 1/2 study of daratumumab, bortezomib, dexamethasone (DVd) with or without venetoclax in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) with assessment for t(11;14) status.

Authors

Michael Thompson

Michael A. Thompson

Advocate Aurora Health, Milwaukee, WI

Michael A. Thompson , Susanna J. Jacobus , Shaji Kumar , Murali Janakiram , Sagar Lonial , Matthias Weiss , Natalie Scott Callander , S. Vincent Rajkumar

Organizations

Advocate Aurora Health, Milwaukee, WI, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, Division of Hematology, Oncology and Transplantation, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA, ThedaCare, Appleton, WI, University of Wisconsin, Fitchburg, WI

Research Funding

U.S. National Institutes of Health
Pharmaceutical/Biotech Company

Background: The most common translocation in multiple myeloma (MM) is t(11;14)(q13;q32), present in approximately 20% of cases. MM cells with t(11;14) usually have a favorable high BCL-2 level and inferior outcomes compared to standard risk MM. Venetoclax (VEN) is a potent, selective, orally available small-molecule BCL-2 inhibitor that induces cell death in MM cell lines and primary samples. VEN has single agent activity in relapsed/refractory MM (RRMM) with an acceptable safety profile, especially in t(11;14) MM; however, non- t(11;14) MM patients may benefit from single agent VEN and VEN incorporated in multi-agent RRMM regimens. Dexamethasone (d) promotes Bcl-2 dependence in MM resulting in sensitivity to VEN and this combination with bortezomib (Vd-VEN) has an acceptable safety profile with high response rates in heavily pre-treated MM. Combination therapy with daratumumab and bortezomib (DVd) has become a standard of care in RRMM. Our hypotheses are that the addition of VEN will improve upon this standard and be most effective in the t(11;14) positive subset. Methods: Eligibility criteria include RRMM with measurable disease, not bortezomib refractory, platelet count > 100K. t(11;14) is an integral biomarker with status (positive or negative) established at registration. After a Ph1 study to determine the recommended phase 2 VEN dose, patients are randomized to DVd +/- VEN [stratified by prior lines of therapy and R-ISS]. The primary Ph2 objectives are to compare 8-cycle minimal residual disease (MRD) negative rate and to inform the role of t(11;14) as a biomarker. The Ph2 design proposed by Freidlin et al. follows a decision algorithm as outlined in the table below. Simulations were run to establish an optimal sample size given various parameters including biomarker prevalence and power to make appropriate decisions for a Ph3 design. Target Ph2 accrual is 240 patients with a 1/3 positive:2/3 negative t(11;14) split. Clinical trial information: NCT03701321

Ph2 Design Decision Algorithm.

StepPopulationApproachIf ResultThen
Rate difference (RD) = DVd+VEN - DVd
1t(11;14) positiveHypothesis Testing: 1-sided alpha=0.10 Ho: RD</=0 Ha: RD>0Not SignificantStep 2A
SignificantStep 2B
2AAll patientsHypothesis Testing: alpha=0.05Not SignificantNo further study
SignificantStandard Ph3
2Bt(11;14) negativeConfidence Interval: 2-sided 80% for RDCI below 10%Biomarker-enrichment Ph3
CI includes 10%Biomarker stratified Ph3
CI above 10%Standard Phase 3

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2019 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Hematologic Malignancies—Plasma Cell Dyscrasia

Track

Hematologic Malignancies—Plasma Cell Dyscrasia

Sub Track

Multiple Myeloma

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT03701321

Citation

J Clin Oncol 37, 2019 (suppl; abstr TPS8052)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2019.37.15_suppl.TPS8052

Abstract #

TPS8052

Poster Bd #

378a

Abstract Disclosures