Advocate Aurora Health, Milwaukee, WI
Michael A. Thompson , Susanna J. Jacobus , Shaji Kumar , Murali Janakiram , Sagar Lonial , Matthias Weiss , Natalie Scott Callander , S. Vincent Rajkumar
Background: The most common translocation in multiple myeloma (MM) is t(11;14)(q13;q32), present in approximately 20% of cases. MM cells with t(11;14) usually have a favorable high BCL-2 level and inferior outcomes compared to standard risk MM. Venetoclax (VEN) is a potent, selective, orally available small-molecule BCL-2 inhibitor that induces cell death in MM cell lines and primary samples. VEN has single agent activity in relapsed/refractory MM (RRMM) with an acceptable safety profile, especially in t(11;14) MM; however, non- t(11;14) MM patients may benefit from single agent VEN and VEN incorporated in multi-agent RRMM regimens. Dexamethasone (d) promotes Bcl-2 dependence in MM resulting in sensitivity to VEN and this combination with bortezomib (Vd-VEN) has an acceptable safety profile with high response rates in heavily pre-treated MM. Combination therapy with daratumumab and bortezomib (DVd) has become a standard of care in RRMM. Our hypotheses are that the addition of VEN will improve upon this standard and be most effective in the t(11;14) positive subset. Methods: Eligibility criteria include RRMM with measurable disease, not bortezomib refractory, platelet count > 100K. t(11;14) is an integral biomarker with status (positive or negative) established at registration. After a Ph1 study to determine the recommended phase 2 VEN dose, patients are randomized to DVd +/- VEN [stratified by prior lines of therapy and R-ISS]. The primary Ph2 objectives are to compare 8-cycle minimal residual disease (MRD) negative rate and to inform the role of t(11;14) as a biomarker. The Ph2 design proposed by Freidlin et al. follows a decision algorithm as outlined in the table below. Simulations were run to establish an optimal sample size given various parameters including biomarker prevalence and power to make appropriate decisions for a Ph3 design. Target Ph2 accrual is 240 patients with a 1/3 positive:2/3 negative t(11;14) split. Clinical trial information: NCT03701321
Step | Population | Approach | If Result | Then |
---|---|---|---|---|
Rate difference (RD) = DVd+VEN - DVd | ||||
1 | t(11;14) positive | Hypothesis Testing: 1-sided alpha=0.10 Ho: RD</=0 Ha: RD>0 | Not Significant | Step 2A |
Significant | Step 2B | |||
2A | All patients | Hypothesis Testing: alpha=0.05 | Not Significant | No further study |
Significant | Standard Ph3 | |||
2B | t(11;14) negative | Confidence Interval: 2-sided 80% for RD | CI below 10% | Biomarker-enrichment Ph3 |
CI includes 10% | Biomarker stratified Ph3 | |||
CI above 10% | Standard Phase 3 |
Disclaimer
This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org
Abstract Disclosures
2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
First Author: Sagar Lonial
ASCO Plenary Series
First Author: Maria-Victoria Mateos
2020 ASCO Virtual Scientific Program
First Author: Jonathan L. Kaufman
2024 ASCO Annual Meeting
First Author: Cesar Rodriguez Valdes