USC Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA
Heinz-Josef Lenz , Sara Lonardi , Vittorina Zagonel , Eric Van Cutsem , M. Luisa Limon , Mark Wong , Alain Hendlisz , Massimo Aglietta , Pilar Garcia-Alfonso , Bart Neyns , Fabio Gelsomino , Dana Backlund Cardin , Tomislav Dragovich , Usman Shah , Jing Yang , Jean-Marie Ledeine , Michael J. Overman
Background: In the phase 2 CheckMate 142 trial, NIVO + low-dose IPI had robust, durable clinical benefit and was well tolerated as 1L therapy for MSI-H/dMMR mCRC (median follow-up 13.8 months [mo; range, 9–19]; Lenz et al. Ann Oncol 2018;29:LBA18). Longer follow-up is presented here. Methods: Patients (pts) with MSI-H/dMMR mCRC and no prior treatment for metastatic disease received NIVO 3 mg/kg Q2W + low-dose IPI 1 mg/kg Q6W until disease progression or discontinuation. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed (INV) objective response rate (ORR) per RECIST v1.1. Results: In 45 pts with median follow-up of 29.0 mo, ORR (95% CI) increased to 69% (53–82) (Table) from 60% (44.3–74.3); complete response (CR) rate increased to 13% from 7%. The concordance rate of INV and blinded independent central review was 89%. Median duration of response (DOR) was not reached (Table). Median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were not reached, and 24-mo rates were 74% and 79%, respectively (Table). Nineteen pts discontinued study treatment without subsequent therapy. An analysis of tumor response post discontinuation will be presented. Ten (22%) pts had grade 3–4 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs); 3 (7%) had grade 3–4 TRAEs leading to discontinuation. Conclusions: NIVO + low-dose IPI continued to show robust, durable clinical benefit with a deepening of response, and was well tolerated with no new safety signals identified with longer follow-up. NIVO + low-dose IPI may represent a new 1L therapy option for pts with MSI-H/dMMR mCRC. Clinical trial information: NTC02060188.
NIVO + low-dose IPI (N = 45) | |
---|---|
ORR,b n (%) [95% CI] | 31 (69) [53–82] |
Best overall response, n (%) | |
CR | 6 (13) |
PR | 25 (56) |
SD | 7 (16) |
PD | 6 (13) |
Not determined | 1 (2) |
Disease control rate,c n (%) [95% CI] | 38 (84) [70.5–93.5] |
Median time to response (range), mo | 2.7 (1.2–27.7) |
Median DOR (range), mo | NR (1.4+ to 29.0+) |
Median PFS, mo (95% CI) | NR (NE) |
24-mo rate, % (95% CI) | 74 (57.2–84.5) |
Median OS, mo (95% CI) | NR (NE) |
24-mo rate, % (95% CI) | 79 (64–89) |
aMedian follow-up = time on study from first dose to data cutoff (29.0 mo [range, 24.2–33.7]).
bPts with CR or PR divided by number of treated pts.
cPts with CR, PR, or SD for ≥ 12 weeks divided by number of treated pts.
NE, not estimable; NR, not reached; PD, progressive disease; PR, partial response; SD, stable disease.
Disclaimer
This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org
Abstract Disclosures
2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
First Author: Heinz-Josef Lenz
2024 ASCO Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium
First Author: Thierry Andre
2022 ASCO Annual Meeting
First Author: Michael J. Overman
2021 Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium
First Author: Heinz-Josef Lenz