Blood serum amyloid A as potential biomarker of pembrolizumab efficacy for patients affected by advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) overexpressing PD-L1: Early results of the FoRECATT Study.

Authors

null

Vincenzo Di Noia

Medical Oncology, Cliniche Humanitas Gavazzeni, Bergamo, Oncological Sciences, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy

Vincenzo Di Noia , Ettore D'Argento , Sara Pilotto , Carmine Carbone , Emanuele Vita , Giovanni Luca Ceresoli , Giordano D. Beretta , Giampaolo Tortora , Emilio Bria

Organizations

Medical Oncology, Cliniche Humanitas Gavazzeni, Bergamo, Oncological Sciences, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy, Department of Oncology, University of Verona Hospital Trust, Verona, Italy, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy, Oncological Sciences, Catholic University of Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy, Medical Oncology, Cliniche Humanitas Gavazzeni, Bergamo, Italy, Oncologia Medica, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli–IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy

Research Funding

No funding received
None

Background: Identifying the patients who may benefit the most from immune checkpoints inhibitors remains a great challenge for clinicians. The tumor-derived Serum Amyloid A (SAA) inhibits the immune-response in melanoma patients. Here we present the early results of FoRECATT study investigating on blood SAA as biomarker of response to upfront pembrolizumab in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods: In this prospective study, patients with PD-L1 ≥ 50% receiving upfront pembrolizumab (P cohort) and with PD-L1 0-49% treated with chemotherapy (CT cohort), were evaluated for blood SAA and radiological response at baseline and every 9 weeks. Primary endpoint was response rate (RR) according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors 1.1; secondary endpoints were progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS). The most accurate SAA cut-off to predict response was established with ROC-analysis in the P cohort. Results: In the P Cohort (n = 42), the overall RR was 38%. After a median follow-up of 18.5 months (mo), baseline SAA ≤ the ROC-derived cut-off (29.9 mg/L; n = 14/42, 33%) was significantly associated with higher RR (53.6 versus 7.1%; OR 15, 95%CI 1.72-130.7, P= 0.009), longer PFS (17.4 versus 2.1 mo; P< 0.0001) and OS (not reached versus 7.2 mo; P< 0.0001) compared with SAA > 29.9 mg/L. In multivariate analysis, low SAA positively affects PFS (P= 0.001) and OS (P= 0.048) irrespective of ECOG PS, number of metastatic sites and pleural effusion. SAA monitoring (n = 40) was also significantly associated with survival endpoints: median PFS 17.4 versus 2.1 mo and median OS not reached versus 7.2 mo when SAA remained low (n = 14) and high (n = 12), respectively. In the CT Cohort (n = 30), RR was not significantly affected by SAA level, while low SAA at baseline (n = 17) was associated with better PFS (HR = 0.42, 95%CI 0.16-1.10, P= 0.02) and OS (HR = 0.16, 95% CI 0.04-0.55, P= 0.0004). Conclusions: Low SAA predicts a higher likelihood of response to upfront pembrolizumab only and good survival outcomes irrespective of treatment in advanced NSCLC patients. Therefore, a simple blood test might be useful to identify patients likely to derive better outcomes from immunotherapy. A further study (FoRECATT-2) is ongoing to confirm the results in a larger validation cohort and to assess the potential effect of SAA on immune response in vitro assays.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2020 ASCO Virtual Scientific Program

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Lung Cancer—Non-Small Cell Metastatic

Track

Lung Cancer

Sub Track

Metastatic Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer

Citation

J Clin Oncol 38: 2020 (suppl; abstr 9598)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2020.38.15_suppl.9598

Abstract #

9598

Poster Bd #

364

Abstract Disclosures