Optimized management of nivolumab (Nivo) and ipilimumab (Ipi) in advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC): A response-based phase II study (OMNIVORE).

Authors

null

Rana R. McKay

Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA

Rana R. McKay , Wanling Xie , Bradley Alexander McGregor , David A. Braun , Xiao X. Wei , Christos Kyriakopoulos , Yousef Zakharia , Benjamin Louis Maughan , Tracy L Rose , Walter Michael Stadler , David F. McDermott , Lauren C Harshman , Toni K. Choueiri

Organizations

Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center, Madison, WI, University of Iowa and Holden Comprehensive Cancer Center, Iowa City, IA, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (UNC-CH) School of Medicine and UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, NC, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Dana-Farber/Harvard Cancer Center, Boston, MA, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA

Research Funding

Pharmaceutical/Biotech Company
BMS

Background: Nivo + Ipi is an established first-line treatment (tx) for advanced RCC. We hypothesized that the addition of CTLA-4 blockade may not be required for all patients (pts). Furthermore, the optimal duration of Nivo maintenance in responding pts is unknown. In this phase II response-adaptive trial, we investigate the sequential addition of 2 doses of Ipi to induce response in Nivo non-responders (NR) and duration of Nivo in responding pts (NCT03203473). Methods: We enrolled pts with advanced RCC with no prior checkpoint inhibitor exposure. All pts received Nivo alone with subsequent arm allocation based on RECISTv1.1 response within 6 months (mos) of tx. Pts with a confirmed partial response (PR) or complete response (CR) within 6 months (mos) discontinued Nivo and were observed (Arm A). Arm A pts reinitiated Nivo if they developed progressive disease (PD); Ipi was added to Nivo if PD persisted or recurred. Pts with stable disease (SD) or PD after no more than 6 mos of Nivo alone received 2 doses of Ipi (Arm B). The primary endpoints were the proportion with PR/CR at 1-year (yr) after Nivo discontinuation (Arm A) and proportion of Nivo NR who convert to PR/CR after adding Ipi (Arm B). Results: 83 pts initiated tx of whom 99% had ECOG 0-1, 96% clear cell RCC, 51% tx-naïve, and 69% IMDC intermediate/poor risk. Median follow-up was 17.0 mos. 15 pts were not allocated to an arm [7 withdrew for PD, 7 withdrew for toxicity, 1 still on tx with unconfirmed PR (uPR)]. At 6 mos, induction Nivo resulted in a confirmed PR in 11% of pts (n=9/83): 12% (n=5/42) tx-naïve, 10% (4/41) prior tx, 8% (n=1/13) favorable risk, 11% (n=8/70) intermediate/poor risk (Table). 11 pts (13%: 9 PR, 1 uPR, 1 SD) were allocated to Arm A, of whom 5 (45%, 90% CI 20-73%) remained off Nivo at ≥ 1 yr. Of 57 pts (69%) allocated to Arm B, 2 pts converted to a PR (4%, 90% CI 1-11%), both of whom had prior tx and PD as best response to Nivo alone. Grade 3-4 treatment related adverse events (TrAE) occurred in 7% (n=6/83) on induction Nivo and in 23% (n=13/57) on Arm B (Nivo + Ipi). Conclusions: We cannot currently recommend a strategy of Nivo followed by response-based addition of Ipi due to the absence of CR and low PR/CR conversion rate (4%). Though a subset of pts treated with Nivo alone can maintain durable responses off tx at 1-yr, early Nivo discontinuation in the absence of toxicity cannot currently be recommended. Investigation into biomarkers to guide tx is ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT03203473.

Induction Nivo (n=83)Ipi Added in NR
Arm B
(n=57)
PR9 (11%)2 (4%)
uPR3 (4%)0
SD36 (43%)24 (42%)
PD35 (42%)23 (40%)
Unevaluable8 (14%)

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2020 ASCO Virtual Scientific Program

Session Type

Oral Abstract Session

Session Title

Genitourinary Cancer—Kidney and Bladder

Track

Genitourinary Cancer—Kidney and Bladder

Sub Track

Kidney Cancer

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT03203473

Citation

J Clin Oncol 38: 2020 (suppl; abstr 5005)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2020.38.15_suppl.5005

Abstract #

5005

Abstract Disclosures