Phase II trial of intermittent therapy in patients (pts) with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) treated with front-line ipilimumab and nivolumab (Ipi/Nivo).

Authors

null

Laeth George

Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH

Laeth George , Wei Wei , C. Marcela Diaz-Montero , Allison Martin , Neil Vyas , Arnab Basu , Katy Beckermann , Amanda Nizam , Christopher Eing Wee , Timothy D. Gilligan , Shilpa Gupta , Brian I. Rini , Moshe Chaim Ornstein

Organizations

Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH, Cleveland Clinic Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland, OH, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland, OH, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, Vanderbilt, Nashville, TN, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland, OH, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN

Research Funding

Pharmaceutical/Biotech Company
Bristol Myers Squibb

Background: The combination of ipilimumab and nivolumab (Ipi/Nivo) is approved for patients (pts) with treatment-naïve, intermediate- and poor-risk metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC), but duration of therapy and safety/efficacy of re-induction at progression is unknown. A phase II trial of intermittent Ipi/Nivo with re-induction at progression was conducted (NCT03126331). Methods: Patients with treatment-naïve mRCC were treated with induction Ipi/Nivo followed by up to 24 weeks (+/- 8 weeks) of maintenance Nivo. Pts who achieved a complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) were eligible for inclusion and entered a treatment-free observation period. Pts were restaged every 12 weeks. Pts with no disease progression (PD) remained off therapy. Upon PD, pts were re-challenged with 2 doses of Ipi/Nivo every 3 weeks, with 1 or 2 more doses at physician discretion. The study objectives were to estimate success rate of observation in pts who achieve a CR/PR (defined by 50% of CR/PR pts sustaining a treatment-free interval of at least 9 months), and to assess toxicity in pts undergoing re-induction. The study was closed early given poor accrual in the rapidly changing mRCC treatment landscape. Results: Nine pts were included; 89% male, median age 57, 78% prior nephrectomy, 67% clear-cell histology, all had KPS ≥ 80%, and 78% were intermediate-risk by IMDC criteria. All pts had 4 doses of induction Ipi/Nivo. Response to Ipi/Nivo and Nivo maintenance prior to enrollment was 33% CR and 67% PR. Most (78%) pts patients have remained off therapy, with a median treatment-free interval (TFI) of 34.3 months (range, 8.7-41.8). The success rate of 0.78 (95% CI: 0.40-0.97) exceeded the pre-specified threshold of 50%. Two pts had PD off therapy (3 and 8 months after therapy cessation; both with best initial response of PR). Both received 2 cycles of re-induction Ipi/Nivo. No grade 3 or greater toxicities occurred with re-induction, but both pts developed PD at their first scans after re-induction. Conclusions: This pilot prospective study demonstrates that patients with a radiographic response to Ipi/Nivo can have prolonged treatment-free intervals. Further studies of de-escalation strategies are warranted. Correlative investigations for this trial are ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT03126331.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2023 ASCO Genitourinary Cancers Symposium

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Poster Session C: Renal Cell Cancer; Adrenal, Penile, Urethral and Testicular Cancers

Track

Renal Cell Cancer,Adrenal Cancer,Penile Cancer,Testicular Cancer,Urethral Cancer

Sub Track

Therapeutics

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT03126331

Citation

J Clin Oncol 41, 2023 (suppl 6; abstr 672)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2023.41.6_suppl.672

Abstract #

672

Poster Bd #

H4

Abstract Disclosures

Similar Abstracts

First Author: Bradley Alexander McGregor

First Author: Regina Barragan-Carrillo