University of California, Sacramento, CA
Primo Lara Jr., Edward Mayerson , Erik Gertz , Catherine Tangen , Amir Goldkorn , Marta Van Loan , Maha H. A. Hussain , Shilpa Gupta , Jingsong Zhang , Przemyslaw Twardowski , David I. Quinn , Nicholas J. Vogelzang , Ian Murchie Thompson Jr., Neeraj Agarwal
Background: We previously reported that baseline BMB are independently prognostic for overall survival (OS) in men with castration resistant prostate cancer. We correlated BMB with outcomes in mHSPC as part of S1216, a phase III trial of ADT +/- the novel CYP17 inhibitor orteronel. Methods: Blood was obtained at study entry for bone resorption [C-telopeptide(CTx) & Pyridinoline(PYD)] & formation markers [C-terminal collagen propeptide(CICP) & bone alkaline phosphatase(BAP)]. With prior DSMC approval, patients were sampled to mask potential treatment effect. Logistic regression was used to assess if BMB elevation above median was prognostic for a PFS event w/in 2 years across pooled study treatment arms, adjusting for baseline variables (including disease extent, PSA, age, pre-randomization ADT, & presence of bone mets). An additional interaction term between BMB elevation & presence of bone mets was included; if significant, separate models were developed for men +/- bone mets. Results: Of 1,313 men, 656 were included in this analysis. All 4 BMB levels were higher in men with a PFS event w/in 2 years vs. those with no PFS event. The odds ratio (OR) for a PFS event was significantly higher in men w/ elevated baseline BMB (see table). For BAP, a significant interaction between marker elevation and bone mets was seen (p = 0.003); men w/ bone mets and BAP elevation had an OR of 1.83 for a PFS event in 2 years. Conclusions: In men with newly diagnosed HSPC, elevated baseline levels of BMB were significantly associated with PFS, with about a two-fold increased risk of a progression event w/in 2 years. For CICP, CTx, & PYD, this association was independent of the presence of bone metastases. Baseline BMB levels have strong prognostic value in the mHSPC context. Correlative analysis of BMB & OS is planned. Clinical trial information: NCT01809691.
Bone metabolism biomarker | Population | Odds Ratio (95% CI) | p-value | Bone marker X presence of bone mets interaction p-value |
---|---|---|---|---|
CICP | Full cohort | 1.73 (1.21, 2.47) | 0.003 | 0.73 |
CTx | Full cohort | 1.90 (1.35, 2.69) | 0.0003 | 0.66 |
PYD | Full cohort | 2.22 (1.56, 3.14) | < 0.0001 | 0.34 |
BAP | Full cohort | --- | --- | 0.003 |
Men with bone mets | 1.83 (1.23, 2.73) | 0.003 | --- | |
Men without bone mets | 0.47 (0.22,1.02) | 0.06 | --- |
Disclaimer
This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org
Abstract Disclosures
2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
First Author: Nicolas Sayegh
2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
First Author: Mamta Parikh
2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
First Author: Primo N Lara Jr.
2022 ASCO Annual Meeting
First Author: Primo "Lucky" N. Lara Jr.